BP Comment Quick Links
| Home | Unfiltered | Articles | Newsletter | Statistics | Fantasy | Events | Radio | Glossary | Search |
![]() |
|
|
|
October 30, 2009 Prospectus TodayA Classic Confrontation
The best short reliever in postseason history, arguably the best relief pitcher in the game's history, on the mound. The best second baseman in baseball, one of the top six players in the game, coming off of a two-homer night, at the plate. Behind him, the greatest left-handed slugger extant. The crowd, 50,000 strong, rising to greet the moment in a beautiful new ballpark on a gorgeous autumn night. One man out. Two men on. A two-run lead in the eighth inning of a World Series game, as close to a must-win for the pitcher's team as the second game of a best-of-seven can be. We sit through a lot of bad baseball, watch a lot of dreary 8-1 wins, shake our heads at all manner of errors, mental and otherwise, and we do it all for a moment like last night's eighth-inning confrontation between Mariano Rivera and Chase Utley. You can't script the drama in baseball, so sometimes the biggest moments come around and you find Rafael Betancourt pitching to Pedro Feliz. The matchups you want to see often happen in mundane situations. Last night, though, we had the setting for greatness, and we had players to match, and we got five minutes of hold-your-breath, bite-your-lip, too-scared-to-cheer tension as Rivera and Utley battled through seven pitches, a sequence in which they traded the upper hand twice—going from 1-0 to 1-2 and on to 3-2—as Rivera danced around the edges of the strike zone and Utley waited patiently for a pitch he could drive. There was a quiet intensity to the moment, two players known for excellence with an absence of flamboyance, professionals in the best sense of the word, executing against one another as a season hung in the balance. Rivera won the matchup, getting Utley to ground into a double play that may have benefited from a bad call at first base. He then dodged a bullet in the ninth inning, allowing a double that brought the tying run to the plate before getting the 27th out. On this night, Rivera would once again cue Metallica with his entrance and Sinatra with his exit, the kind of book-end music combination you usually only find on Weird Al Yankovic albums. "Enter Sandman" may be Rivera's signature tune, but it's the frequency with which he ends his workday to the sound of Ol' Blue Eyes that had made him a legend of the game, and a hero in the Bronx. Rivera would not have been in position to get the last six outs had A.J. Burnett not crushed the job of getting the first 21. It certainly wasn't the best start of his career, but Burnett may never have executed a game plan as thoroughly as he did last night. Taking the mound amid concern over what a Phillies team—one that loves fastballs and loves getting into hitters' counts—could do to the sometimes erratic, always hard-throwing Burnett, the righty defied all expectations with two pitches: first-pitch strikes and a sharp, backdoor breaking ball that froze left-handed hitters all night. The Phillies had a plan—the first seven hitters took the first pitch—and Burnett beat it—he started the first 11 hitters with a strike, and 22 of the 25 batters he faced 0-1. A.J. Burnett often has innings where he is 1-0 to four or five batters. He was 1-0 three times all last night. Almost every time he was in a key spot in the game, he made a great pitch to get out of it. We started the night wondering what Pedro Martinez might do to amaze us, and instead got mesmerized by the unexpected. How very like baseball. It's not like Martinez didn't put on a show. Ranging up and down the velocity table, Martinez worked primarily off of his changeup to keep the Yankees off-balance all night. He allowed two runs in his first six innings, and probably should not have been allowed out for the seventh inning to give up his third. The outing was exactly what Martinez has done in his best work since joining the Phillies in July: pitching backwards, pitching from behind, but using such a wide array of pitches thrown at disparate velocities and locations to keep the opposition from squaring up balls. The two Yankee homers came off of good pitches, the first a changeup on the outer half of the plate that Mark Teixeira went out and got, yanking it over the fence in right-center. The second came on a curve well down and in on which Hideki Matsui had to clear out his entire front side to golf it into the right-field seats. Martinez beat himself up a bit for that one, saying, "I was disappointed because maybe the pitch wasn't the one I would probably have chosen if I were to think again." Perhaps, but Matsui really had to work to get the ball out of the park.
|
Too bad it takes the disaster of the 1st 2 rounds of the playoffs to motivate baseball and the unps to get things right. In this series so far, the umps missed a few bang-bang calls, but have not made an egregious error and have consulted each other and talked through two calls to ensure they got things right. I have no problem with any upiring in these 1st two games.
Actually, on Damon liner, the umpires consulted, talked it though, and still got it wrong. If that's not an argument for expanded use of replay, I don't know what is. It would have been quicker to check the replay and get the call right than to have all six of them huddle together and still fail.
One hard part about instant replay, is that the runner needs to know immediately if the ball was caught or not. If the ump calls it a grounder live, then the runner has to run. What happens if they replay it and say it's a catch? It's not fair to then call the runner our for not getting back to the base. MLB needs to figure out a total system if they do want to implement instant replay. That's a much harder question.
Either way, I'm not sure what Howard was thinking. If he thought he caught it he should have just stepped on first. If not, he should have thrown to 2B immediately or gotten the sure out at first. His indecision and late throw could have been a disaster.
I agree that the Howard play is a tough one for instant replay advocates since what Howard does is presumably influenced by what the umpire calls, although his decision in this case to throw to first seemed to come immediately upon the out call being made oddly enough. However if you go to the replay and determine it's not caught can you really call both guys safe since Howard assumed one was out(maybe) when he made his decision to throw.
I argue that in a world where baseball has instant replay, Howard would have known that he didn't catch it and wouldn't (or at least shouldn't) be worried about what the umps thought he did, because he'd know the truth would be revealed.
The egregious error in this case was that Rivera threw about six balls to Utley before the double play grounder and it should have been Howard vs Mo with the bases juiced and one out. After all the kvetching Joe has done about balls/strikes over the last three weeks I can't imagine how he let that pitch sequence go by without comment.
Got a link for that. I don't recall the AB going like that.
Silly of me. I can look this up myself on Brooks. Though it's being really clunky right now (maybe it's my comp, I dunno).
I looked it up. There was one pitch in that at-bat (the second pitch) that was a ball but was called a strike. So you've got a beef, but not nearly as much of one as you said.
True, but the pitch he grounded out on was in the same spot as the miscalled ball. The conclusion I take from that is that Utley felt forced to swing at a ball for fear that he'd be rung up.
You are right, six was an exaggeration but I pretty clearly remember at least one of the called strikes (Ithink the second one) being way off on the Fox graph.
Would have made it 2-1, can't remember where the pitch was that he fouled off at 1-2.
Of course Mo's approach changes too with the different count so who knows?
Still a great at-bat though.