CSS Button No Image Css3Menu.com

Baseball Prospectus home
  
  
Click here to log in Click here for forgotten password Click here to subscribe

<< Previous Article
Premium Article Mid-Season Outliers (07/15)
<< Previous Column
Premium Article Pebble Hunting: The Se... (07/12)
Next Column >>
Premium Article Pebble Hunting: The Be... (07/18)
Next Article >>
Premium Article What You Need to Know:... (07/15)

July 15, 2013

Pebble Hunting

The Spectator Attention Test

by Sam Miller

I feel like we've been dancing around this for a while. The Tweeters at AT&T Park. The probably dead A's fan. All of these people. It's pretty clear that loads of people attend baseball games but nobody actually watches baseball games.

This was something I never noticed until I did, and now I notice constantly, just like how I can no longer not notice that pitchers have absolutely no idea where they're throwing the ball. The other day I suggested that nobody in a park (except the scouts and, in some cases, the manager) actually watches 10 pitches in a row. Well, then.

This is the third inning of the Diamondbacks and Brewers on Friday. I chose the third inning because everybody should have had time to get settled in, and nobody should be too bored or tired. I chose the Diamondbacks and Brewers because the game has playoff implications for the home team, so fans should be reasonably interested in the outcome. Also, because the game was close enough that nobody should have really checked out who wasn't already interested in checking out. Our focus is on 15 individuals, each of whom occupies an extremely valuable piece of real estate:

(Seat 16 is not a real seat and is thus included only to observe the constant flow of traffic in and out of it, not for any statistics.) The club level tickets cost $120 per in Arizona, but so far as I can tell this is a tier better than that. Let's just assume that each one costs, oh, $450,000. These fans paid nearly a half million dollars apiece to be near this game.

So, treating the first pitch of the third inning as Pitch 1, here we go.

Pitch 1

Not watching: 1, 5, 8, 9, 14
Is guidance counselor from Freaks and Geeks: 16
Have yet to miss a pitch: 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15

(Quick note on methodology: in some instances, fans are blocked. They are given credit for viewing the pitch. Absent fans are not. And I tried to be extremely liberal in counting a viewing. If the fan is facing forward, he or she is generally given credit.)

Pitch 2

Not watching: 5, 6, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15
Is a pair of feet: 16
Yet to miss a pitch: 2, 3, 4, 7, 11

Pitch 3

Not watching: 5, 6, 13, 14
Absent: 15
Is a lady's bottom: 16
Have yet to miss a pitch: 2, 3, 4, 7, 11

We are three pitches in, and a third of our group has seen every pitch. I'm actually surprised by how high this is. We have relatively dedicated fans here tonight. Three pitches! Can you even imagine watching three pitches in a row at a baseball game you paid to attend? I'm sleepy thinking about it.

Pitch 4

Not watching: 2, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15
Absent: 12
Is picking up trash perhaps: 16
Have yet to miss a pitch: 3, 4, 7

So 20 percent of fans capable of watching four pitches in a row.

Pitch 5

Not watching: 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 14, 15
Absent: 12
Is an empty void: 16
Have yet to miss a pitch: 3

1 in 15 fans watches five pitches in a row thrown by a hometown rookie phenom under reasonably tense conditions. There are four, maybe five people watching this pitch.

Pitch 6

Not watching: 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 14, 15
Is a man's bottom: 16
Have yet to miss a pitch: 3

Pitch 7

Not watching: 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 14, 15
Is a foot, descending: 16
Have yet to miss a pitch: 3

Pitch 8

Not watching: 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 15
Is a well-lit woman in profile: 16
Have yet to miss a pitch: 3

Pitch 9

Not watching: 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 12, 15
Is a lady's ponytail: 16
Have yet to miss a pitch: nobody.

So there we have it. The most pitches anybody can watch in a row is eight. And, while it's not a perfectly straight line down, we do seem to see lower attention paid to pitches the further from the start of an inning we get. The first three pitches were watched by eight to 10 fans, out of 15. This is the ninth pitch of an inning, and of the 14 fans we can see (no. 13 being, as she often was, blocked by the right-handed batter) there are six people watching. That is, I would say, counting generously: fans 7 and 10 are staring off somewhere uncertain, but it's too close to exclude them. Even the lady in red has turned her back on the game. Somebody asked me the other day what age is a good age to start taking kids to baseball games. The girl in the front row, on the left (her left), was so much as facing the field one time.

I didn't know when we'd run out of active participants, so I prepared and counted for 19 of these. Here are the final stats for all 19:

  • 46.5 percent of fans were watching a pitch at any given time
  • The most fans for any pitch was 10 out of 15
  • Fan no. 3 watched the most pitches: 17 of 19
  • Fan no. 15 watched the fewest: 3 of 19. Fan no. 14 watched four.
  • The young woman in seat eight watched six pitches; her date watched 16. We make no judgments about their relationship.
  • Eight remained the longest streak observed, duplicated by fan no. 3 and matched by fan no. 7. Fan no. 11 saw seven in a row.
  • Eleven fans watched no more than four pitches in a row.
  • "Seat" 16 was later occupied by a man in board shorts, and by a guy in dorky black shoes and dorky black shorts.

And, yes, I'd have to be pretty dumb indeed not to notice the significance of doing a piece about not watching baseball while aggressively watching the non-baseball parts of the screen. Congratulations on noticing the significance, too!

Sam Miller is an author of Baseball Prospectus. 
Click here to see Sam's other articles. You can contact Sam by clicking here

Related Content:  Fans

8 comments have been left for this article. (Click to hide comments)

BP Comment Quick Links

Chiefsnark

I'm not sure that the fans in the most expensive seats are a fair study group. Given the costs of the tickets, and the likelihood that many, if not most, are held by corporations, it seems as likely as not that these are not people who went to the game because of a keen interest in it.

Jul 15, 2013 07:22 AM
rating: 7
 
Andy Cochrane

Great as ever Sam.

Jul 15, 2013 08:36 AM
rating: 5
 
Jason Wojciechowski

I would have given 11 a bonus for gesturing toward the pitcher on the first pitch. Obviously double-engaged.

Jul 15, 2013 09:06 AM
rating: 0
 
BobcatBaseball

Did your kids ever ask you why you were watching people watching a basebl game?

Jul 15, 2013 10:24 AM
rating: 1
 
BurrRutledge

I don't have the attention span to watch other people watching a baseball game.

Jul 15, 2013 19:38 PM
rating: 0
 
Llarry

"16" is probably often a park employee. The lower box seats are eligible for wait service of food and drink. That's also in the vicinity of one of the entrances to the under-stands club area those seatholders have access to.

To be fair, I keep a scorebook, and there are pitches that I miss (often, but not always due to writing), or ones where I look up just in time to watch the pitch reach the plate.

Jul 15, 2013 14:40 PM
rating: 0
 
parkerreal

Dorky clothes is part of the official uniform at the BOB. I still have my guest services hat from my college job there.

Jul 15, 2013 16:23 PM
rating: 0
 
mdupske

I went to a Tennessee Smokies game 2 years ago. They had an Attention Cam between innings to see how long it would take someone to notice that they were on the Jumbotron (with a timer running) due to the fact that they were staring at their phone. Usually ran 5-10 seconds but one guy would not look up from his 'important' screen and ran the whole between inning, at least 60 seconds, without looking up. The inning began with this guy buried in his phone. I would love to see this a MLB game.

Jul 15, 2013 20:58 PM
rating: 1
 
You must be a Premium subscriber to post a comment.
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
<< Previous Article
Premium Article Mid-Season Outliers (07/15)
<< Previous Column
Premium Article Pebble Hunting: The Se... (07/12)
Next Column >>
Premium Article Pebble Hunting: The Be... (07/18)
Next Article >>
Premium Article What You Need to Know:... (07/15)

RECENTLY AT BASEBALL PROSPECTUS
Premium Article Minor League Update: Games of Wednesday, May...
Premium Article Painting the Black: Stealing Signs
Fantasy Rounders: Statistical Crossroads
Eyewitness Accounts: May 28, 2015
Premium Article Pitching Backward: Started From the Bottom, ...
Premium Article The Call-Up: Eduardo Rodriguez
Premium Article Some Projection Left: Ask the Industry: Catc...

MORE FROM JULY 15, 2013
Premium Article Transaction Analysis: Altuve, All the Time
Premium Article What You Need to Know: The Lincecum Before t...
Premium Article Mid-Season Outliers
Premium Article The Prospectus Hit List: Monday, July 15
Overthinking It: This Week in Catcher Framin...
Premium Article Daily Roundup: Around the League: July 15, 2...
The Week in Quotes: July 8-14

MORE BY SAM MILLER
2013-07-17 - BP Daily Podcast: Effectively Wild Episode 2...
2013-07-16 - BP Daily Podcast: Effectively Wild Episode 2...
2013-07-16 - BP Unfiltered: The LOL-Time Home Run Derby T...
2013-07-15 - Pebble Hunting: The Spectator Attention Test
2013-07-15 - BP Daily Podcast: Effectively Wild Episode 2...
2013-07-12 - Premium Article Pebble Hunting: The Season's Best LOOGY
2013-07-12 - BP Daily Podcast: Effectively Wild Episode 2...
More...

MORE PEBBLE HUNTING
2013-07-26 - Premium Article Pebble Hunting: The Real Reason Why Zack Whe...
2013-07-22 - Pebble Hunting: Baseball's Paper Airplane Pr...
2013-07-18 - Premium Article Pebble Hunting: The Best Pitches Thrown This...
2013-07-15 - Pebble Hunting: The Spectator Attention Test
2013-07-12 - Premium Article Pebble Hunting: The Season's Best LOOGY
2013-07-10 - Premium Article Pebble Hunting: Matt Harvey, Ross Detwiler, ...
2013-07-01 - Premium Article Pebble Hunting: Felix Hernandez, Lance Lynn,...
More...

INCOMING ARTICLE LINKS
2014-06-20 - Pebble Hunting: Clayton Kershaw and the Fan ...