Notice: Trying to get property 'display_name' of non-object in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-seo/src/generators/schema/article.php on line 52
keyboard_arrow_uptop

There were two trillion possible half-versions of you. And your father, he encountered thousands of women in his life, any of whom could have been your mom, bringing us into the quadrillions of possibilities for you. And there were two trillion possible half-versions of him, and there were thousands of women in his life, all of whom had two trillion possible half-versions and thousands of possible mothers who all had two trillion possible half-versions of themselves, besides, of course, having thousands of possible mothers (who each had two trillion possible half-versions of themselves). This sentence stretches back millions of years, every word of it snapping together in just such a way that of those trillions to the power of trillions of possible outcomes one survived and produced you. You are alive because math finally just gave up and guessed an answer, and the answer was you, and the answer was loved, and the answer loved back, because life is good and sweet heavens are we lucky to be part of it.

And tomorrow, you’ll drive to work and you’ll be one second too late to make the yellow light, and you’ll think, “why can’t I ever catch a break?”

Baseball has a luck problem. Nobody on the field even wants to say the word, hear the word. You try to ask them about their run differential or their BABIP or their FIP and it’s a different kind of blank look than you get when you ask about other nerd stuff—this is the do-not-engage blank look, the let’s-keep-this-grounded look, the keep-me-away-from-your-wrathful-pagan-god-science look. They don’t want to hear that they’ve been lucky, because that implies they’re not so good, and that they’re going to get worse. They don’t want to hear that they’ve been unlucky, because it’s even worse to be cursed than to be bad—the latter at least having a theoretical fix. Or perhaps both of those explanations are wrong, but something about the luck conversation marginalizes what these guys do, turns it from a game of skill (legal in all but five states!) to simple gambling. It is a game of skill. It is absolutely a game of skill, and the Cubs won the National League Wild Card game 4-0 because they were extremely skillful. You could not watch Jake Arrieta throw high cheese and steal second base and not see the skill. It’s also, unfortunately for the Pirates, a game of luck, a million years of gods-sex producing a moment when the bat boy walks through the dugout patting your shoulder and shaking your hand and telling you thanks and you’ll get ‘em next year.

It was bad luck that Bud Selig decided two Wild Cards were better than one. It was bad luck before that that the Mayflower Pilgrims landed in Plymouth Rock, and that the population centers that eventually grew around them were in cold-weather regions where baseball, a sport invented 200 years later and finally lit 100 after that, could be played for only seven months per year, thus forcing Selig to cram his new toy into the only-sized toy box he had. If the first Thanksgiving had been in the Delta, we probably have nine-month seasons right now, and the Wild Card series lasts as long as the Olympics.

It was bad luck that this was the year the Pirates managed to win 98 games, the most they've won in a century. If only they had won 98 games in 2010 (when a Wild Card berth would have granted them entry into an LDS) or 2011 (when 98 would have won them the division) or 2012 (when, yes, they’d have had to play their way in, but against Kyle Lohse, not Jake friggin Arrieta), this magnificent season–Francisco Cervelli and Jung-Ho Kang and J.A. Happ, so much fun, so much magic–wouldn't have ended after just one extra gate.

It was bad luck that the Cardinals had their voodoo magic cranked all the way up to Eye Of Newt this year, clusterlucking past the Pirates despite holding the third-best third-order winning percentage in the group. Heck, it was bad luck that the Cubs didn’t grab a few extra wins and capture that division (with the best third-order record, incidentally)—sure, the Pirates would still have been in the coin-flip game, but against Michael Wacha or John Lackey or certainly something human. It was terrible luck that it had to be Arrieta. It was bad luck that the Orioles traded him to the Cubs of all teams (barely two years ago!) for a couple of lousy future trivia answers. It was bad luck that three months ago a sexy karate lady kidnapped Arrieta and took him to her leader and offered him the blue pill or the red pill. It was bad luck that Arrieta was able to pitch on full rest, which in a sense means it was bad luck that, for whatever reason MLB chose to have the AL Wild Card game go first, MLB chose to have the AL Wild Card game go first. It was bad luck that, when this day came, Arrieta woke up and he had it. Some days they don’t, and he did.

It was bad luck that, when Arrieta left pitches out over the plate, and the Pirates put good swings on them, those balls went right at people—like in the fourth, when Harrison, McCutchen and Marte went fly out to right, line out to right, line out to first—all hit well, or at least square. It was bad luck that, when they took pitches outside the zone, there was an umpire who was looking for reasons to say yes. It was bad luck that, when they smoked a line drive, it went right into Kris Bryant’s glove, and then when it popped out of Kris Bryant’s glove, it somehow went right into his bare hand. It was bad luck that a hard-hit ball with the bases loaded in the sixth was, instead of a double, a double play. And that the same basic thing happened the next inning, except this one was even harder and more double-like (though with only one runner on). It’s not so much that baseball is a game of inches—the 100 meters, after all, is also a game of inches, uncontroversially–but that it’s a game of inches that nobody on the field has the remotest control over.

It’s just a rotten way to go. Last year, when so much was made of the Giants’ ability to leverage Madison Bumgarner’s otherworldliness, by having him throw 33 percent of their postseason innings, like can you even imagine such a thing, 33 percent? But for the Pirates, 100 percent of the postseason was against Jake Arrieta. If you stretched this postseason out on a molecular level so that it lasted forever, there'd always be Jake Arrieta, in the beginning and in the end, the everpresent sun around which the whole Pirates solar system revolved, and it would be an evil sun that burned holes in their umbrellas and vomited sun gas all over their pets.

Just appreciate for a second how lucky we are that we were all born under the good sun.

The Pirates are unlucky that this was what Bud Selig wanted: He wanted a tournament at the end of the year to decide the winner, just like almost every good sport has. Nobody in their right mind would think this is the best way to determine the best team. It’d be like medical schools basing their applications process on how many answers you can get on an old episode of The Weakest Link. It’s arbitrary, and it’s sadistically unfair. You have our sympathies, Pirates: The Cubs didn't deserve worse, but you deserved better. You are the victims of a cruel idea that seems, on nights like tonight, to aspire for nothing more than sad crowd shots of old men in funny pirate hats.

And this might be my favorite part of baseball. Can’t help it: I was born like this.

Thank you for reading

This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.

Subscribe now
You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe
Guancous
10/08
* Standing ovation *
quackman
10/08
I _love_ the yellow light line.

Also, I think there's a word missing in "clusterlucking their past the Pirates"
jmercan
10/08
That is a beautiful opening paragraph.
johnwood427
10/08
I bow in your general direction.
apbadogs
10/08
"You have our sympathies, Pirates: The Cubs didn't deserve worse, but you deserved better."

Or we could just go back to only division winners getting in the playoffs. You don't want to play a one game crapshoot? Win your division.
randolph3030
10/08
As if winning the division is within their complete control. They were two games back of the Cards and lost four one-run games to them. A bounce, a bloop, some slightly less wet grass in that 9/28 game that they blew on an error and the Pirates might just have won the division. But, they had some bad luck.
BillJohnson
10/08
Of course, the Cardinals also punted three games at the end of the season that didn't matter to anyone except the pitchers of record, to keep players from getting hurt in unplayable conditions and missing the games that will actually matter. This division wasn't as close as the final W-L records make it look.
GBSimons
10/11
"As if winning the division is within their complete control."

Well, if they had a better front office, players, manager, coaches, etc., they could have won more games throughout the season and won the division. No, it's not "within their complete control," but it also didn't boil down simply to the outcome of that single 9/28 game.
tomshipley75
10/08
Another bit of bad luck for the Pirates: Under the old WC format, they would have beaten the Cubs by a game to win a spot in the best-of-five LDS. The Cubs benefited from the expanded WC and took advantage.
geofflong
10/08
Excellent work. Ties together the stats and the humanity of it all, in one highly amusing package. Thanks.
cmellinger
10/08
Thanks. You're a good editor I am sure, but a better writer. We miss you.
tannerg
10/08
This!
fawcettb
10/08
Sun gas? Really?
lazyitis
10/08
Truly great.
bobbygrace
10/08
Three words to make my day: "by Sam Miller."
cchatham
10/08
This article completely sums up how I feel being a Pirates fan right now. 98 wins deserved better than this, but at the same time the 97 wins of the Cubs deserved to move on as well. Just complete luck that the three best teams in baseball were all in the same division this year. Do you think MLB ever decides to forgo ranking division winners ahead of wild cards and just seed based on wins for all the teams that made the playoffs?
granbergt
10/08
This made my morning.
trueblue33
10/08
Oh Sam Miller, your genius is showing.
davewoody12
10/08
Please excuse the language, Sam, but this is a motherfucking masterpiece. I think it's the best thing ever written about sports.
briankopec
10/08
You probably don't read enough.
willtravel
10/08
Ummm, all the genuflection makes me wonder why I feel this piece is so much ass-hattery.

The playoffs are not about determining the best team. They are about giving us more games that we, and above all the scribes, will somehow layer all sorts of meaning onto, while the owners of the teams and the TV networks and the bars and the hotels, etc can create an economy around our caring about it. Which is as it should be.

It is a tournament. No more; no less. Winning a tournament is great. And for some reason we believe one-game elimination is appropriate in football and one-game elimination is inappropriate in baseball. And for some reason, we believe this post-season tournament means more than a pres-season one like the World Baseball Classic (or whatever it's called). We can argue all we want about why this is and should be so, but all it will come down to is a different set of assumptions.
ErikBFlom
10/08
Well, written, but wrong. Only the regular season should count in determining who makes the playoffs. In theory, the wild-card play-in gives teams that played unbalanced schedules a chance to face each other, but one game doesn't resolve which is the better team, and even 5 probably does not.

Better to return to two divisions, and extend the season in other ways. Longer playoffs (9 games), a longer regular season, or even just longer spring training.
oldbopper
10/08
This was worth the price of BP for this year and as many more years as I have been gifted under this good sun. Baseball, with its 162 game schedule, is supposed to even out the luck but in that one game, that one single game, the baseball gods make a choice.
andykaylor
10/08
Having never forgiven the Pirates for winning the '79 World Series, I was feeling very skeptical about this article right up until the moment when I read this sentence: "And this might be my favorite part of baseball." That one sentence made the entire article perfect!
briankopec
10/08
Everyone is focused on whether the Pirates (or Cubs) or any playoff team "deserves" to have its fate determined in a single game. That presumes that Major League Baseball exists to serve the players rather than the fans. Crowning a World Series champion is not about determining who "deserves" the crown. How would you even define the word "deserves" in this context? Is it the team that had the best 162 game record? Is it the team that is the best right now? Is it the team that is the luckiest? Is it the team that is the best combination of all of those things?

The real victims of the 1 game playoff, if there are any, are the fans. We deserve to see the best teams play a lengthy series of games to determine who will advance. Putting 2 of the best, most entertaining teams in a 1 game playoff deprives the fans of the entertainment of a long series. As a Pirate fan I am sad to see their season so unceremoniously. As a baseball fan I am sad that such a promising match-up has to end so abruptly.
eas9898
10/08
Didn't they match up like, what, 20 games this season?

briankopec
10/09
Right. So perhaps all rounds should be single elimination then? The Cards and Cubs played each other 19 times too.
oldbopper
10/09
These are wild card teams. They did not win the Central Division of the National League. The one game playoff is exactly what wild card teams should play. They have earned a chance to catch lightning in a bottle, but no more! IMHO, the present system is as good as it gets. The division title means something again and the battles to avoid the dreaded one game playoff and gain home field are important. The previous system in which the single wild card had equal status with the three Division winners was awful. I will accept debate over one game or two out of three but, for myself, the one game is the answer.
briankopec
10/09
And you missed my point. I don't care who deserved what. A playoff system should maximize the entertainment value for the fans. I don't feel like a 1 and done for either of these teams does justice to us. Don't you want more high leverage baseball from the best teams?
EMielke
10/09
Lets be honest though. It's hard to think of luck being much of a factor in Jake Arriettas performance last night and since the all star break.

Both teams had their ace on the mound so nothing to quibble with in that regard either. The playoffs are fun. As far as whether they reward the best teams? It's possible for the best team to win the World Series but the system is set up not necessarily for that to be the case.

It's set up for creating a short exciting tournament that is uber profitable for owners, tv and players.
dkarpis
10/09
I like the cruelty, maximized luck factor and ace-burning realities of a one game wild card playoff. It's fast forwarding straight to game seven. Every moment is amped to the max and there is no tomorrow.

Teams should be rewarded for winning their divisions. The reward is skipping the brutal one game winner-takes-all wild card round.
oldbopper
10/10
The fact that the wild card teams have to use their ace in the one game playoff is another big positive. It gives the team with the best record an added advantage which is as it should be.
GBSimons
10/11
"it somehow went right into his bare hand."

Actually, it went right into his gloved hand, as the video you linked to showed.