Notice: Trying to get property 'display_name' of non-object in /var/www/html/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-seo/src/generators/schema/article.php on line 52
keyboard_arrow_uptop

I think it's something close to common knowledge that Chris Sale pitched to contact last season. Sale talked about it. White Sox pitching coach Don Cooper talked about it. It showed up pretty plainly in the numbers, as Sale racked up a career-high in innings pitched and led the American League in complete games. The idea was a simple one: Sale is good enough to get batters out at an elite rate even without striking them out at an elite rate.

It was true, too. Sale fanned just a hair over a quarter of opposing hitters, instead of nearly a third of them. He posted the worst FIP of his career by a fair margin and gave up more home runs (27) than he ever had. Meanwhile, opposing batters reached base on balls in play at the lowest rate of Sale's starting career. All told, DRA and cFIP do indicate that Sale was slightly worse last season than in the two previous campaigns, but the extra innings he was able to pitch offset that and made him more valuable.

Of course, that alteration in mentality required a well-calibrated change in actual approach. Sale would need to be around the strike zone more and rely less on his secondary pitches. He did both of those things, bumping his Called Strike Probability from 0.470 to 0.493 (or from the 46th percentile to the 90th, in terms of sheer control), and raising his four-seam fastball usage rate to 45.3 percent, the highest it has ever been.

When you throw fastballs in the strike zone, though, you tend to get hit hard. Sale's fastball is an exceptional one—it had the most extreme horizontal movement and the most sink of any four-seamer thrown at least 1,000 times by a given hurler last year—but that didn't mean he would necessarily be an exception to that rule. Sale, therefore, made a small adjustment. He started throwing his four-seamer at almost uniquely variable speeds.

He still threw 34 pitches 97 miles per hour or harder, which is more than many guys who threw harder than Sale on average—including Vince Velasquez, Taijuan Walker, Jake Arrieta, and Jacob deGrom. Obviously, throwing consecutive fastballs is not a plan designed to generate swings and misses, or even a great many called strikes. Most of our pitch tunneling data isn't relevant to it. But when it comes to changing speeds on that pitch, there's something to see.

Our database shows 343 pitcher seasons since 2008 during which a hurler followed a four-seam fastball with another one at least 500 times. Only one of those (Danys Baez's 2009 season) averaged more velocity separation on consecutive heaters than Sale had in 2016. Both pitchers averaged .0063 seconds of flight time difference on consecutive fastballs, by the time they reached the tunnel point. That sounds minuscule, but it works out to perhaps a mile per hour. It's also considerably more than almost anyone else achieves. Of the aforementioned 343 pitcher seasons, in only 14 did hurlers average even .0050 seconds of separation on back-to-back heaters.

The ability to add and subtract on the fastball is a skill about which well-respected pitching coaches and color commentators have spoken for decades. It's been held up as the mark of a true artisan. It's a skill that allows pitchers to induce mis-hit balls, rather than having to work deep counts and chase strikeouts in order to be effective. For the first time, we have a way to quantify which pitchers do it best and most often.

This isn't Sale losing velocity as games move along. It's a pitch-to-pitch effort to keep the ball off the barrels of opposing hitters' bats while still pounding the strike zone. We don't really know whether it worked. We do know that it wasn't an accident, and given that Sale and Cooper seemingly accepted more hard hits as a tradeoff for the opportunity to pitch deeper into games, I feel comfortable calling it a smart strategy.

We can monitor this in the early going of this coming season to see whether Sale will continue this gambit under a new pitching coach and in a new environment. He might do well to revert to his old approach, given the immutable danger of allowing an opponent (especially a right-handed batter) to make contact at Fenway Park. If he does decide to continue choosing volume over sheer dominance, we now also know that he has demonstrated a unique ability to do one of the things most vital to success in that endeavor.

Thank you for reading

This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.

Subscribe now
You need to be logged in to comment. Login or Subscribe
onegameref
2/24
It's going to be difficult to see Sale in a different pair of Sox this season. I feel bad for the Pale Hose now having to face him.
oldbopper
2/25
If Sale isn't trying to maximize his FIP then what value does FIP have? He might even be trying to stay in the game longer which might result in more, (don't say it, don't say it) of that horrible, ostracized, archaic statistic, wins.