Every year, in both real baseball and the fantasy version, we tell ourselves that certain players are prone to either fast starts or slow starts, as in: “Don’t worry, that player always gets off to a slow start. He’ll come around.” Or, “that guy is always en fuego in April. If you’re counting on a 40 HR, 100 RBI season from him, you’re surely going to be disappointed.”
In deeper leagues, it’s irrelevant whether a player is a hot starter or a cold starter. If you spend $20 on a slow-starting corner infielder and your alternatives in the free agent pool are Eduardo Escobar and Pedro Ciriaco, you’re not going to jettison the slow starter for these bottom-of-the-barrel options.
Mixed leagues are another story entirely. If you own a player who is traditionally a slow starter, it might behoove you to sit him in April. Along these lines, you might try to add a weaker player who is otherwise a fast starter to your roster at the end of your draft (or in the reserve phase) to gain an advantage over your opponents that don’t pay attention to this type of arcane data.
At least, that is what conventional wisdom says. What does recent history tell us?
Table 1: Fast Staring Hitters: 2009-2013
April Rank by OPS |
||||||
Player |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
Average |
17 |
9 |
13 |
||||
24 |
12 |
3 |
12 |
16 |
13.4 |
|
1 |
27 |
14 |
||||
21 |
10 |
6 |
25 |
11 |
14.6 |
|
7 |
14 |
11 |
38 |
17.5 |
||
27 |
36 |
4 |
24 |
33 |
24.8 |
|
25 |
1 |
15 |
100 |
14 |
31 |
|
41 |
82 |
4 |
18 |
36.25 |
||
65 |
10 |
37.5 |
||||
23 |
45 |
7 |
1 |
133 |
41.8 |
|
9 |
76 |
42.5 |
||||
6 |
18 |
51 |
94 |
47 |
43.2 |
|
49 |
2 |
52 |
5 |
122 |
46 |
|
90 |
8 |
41 |
46.33 |
|||
109 |
43 |
1 |
51 |
|||
56 |
3 |
56 |
110 |
32 |
51.4 |
|
82 |
108 |
8 |
54 |
9 |
52.2 |
|
118 |
25 |
79 |
6 |
34 |
52.4 |
|
141 |
2 |
22 |
55 |
|||
145 |
29 |
2 |
58.67 |
|||
57 |
26 |
107 |
108 |
6 |
60.8 |
|
4 |
43 |
102 |
98 |
61.75 |
||
2 |
66 |
37 |
144 |
62.25 |
||
138 |
88 |
12 |
66 |
10 |
62.8 |
|
96 |
9 |
84 |
63 |
|||
5 |
94 |
149 |
17 |
75 |
68 |
|
138 |
40 |
95 |
4 |
69.25 |
||
8 |
8 |
87 |
165 |
87 |
71 |
|
86 |
101 |
100 |
78 |
5 |
74 |
|
100 |
46 |
162 |
9 |
79.25 |
||
109 |
1 |
146 |
62 |
79.5 |
||
41 |
6 |
159 |
83 |
123 |
82.4 |
|
10 |
77 |
165 |
84 |
|||
171 |
80 |
2 |
84.33 |
|||
194 |
7 |
58 |
86.33 |
|||
99 |
157 |
7 |
87.67 |
|||
164 |
75 |
5 |
131 |
68 |
88.6 |
|
97 |
7 |
193 |
123 |
27 |
89.4 |
|
70 |
32 |
173 |
183 |
8 |
93.2 |
|
160 |
57 |
3 |
176 |
99 |
||
151 |
5 |
166 |
107.33 |
|||
4 |
137 |
192 |
111 |
|||
10 |
168 |
166 |
114.67 |
There is a lot to digest in this table, but the notion of a consistently fast-starting hitter seems to be more of a mirage than anything else. The hitters who are the most consistently strong starters happen to be the best hitters in the game. Ryan Braun, Miguel Cabrera, Joey Votto, and Robinson Cano all are fast starters.
But, so what? The types of hitters we’re looking to find in this type of analysis are players who are middling or at best above average that consistently shine in April. For the most part these hitters are next-to-impossible to find. Paul Konerko pre-2013 is the closest thing we have to that: a very good hitter who is very good in April in some seasons and near-godly in others.
The vast majority of hitters on this table are anything but consistently fast starters; in fact, they’re all over the place. If you think Prince Fielder is a fast starter because of 2011 and 2013, you are selectively ignoring the other years on this table. David Wright is a similar example: three strong starts, one mediocre one, and one poor one. For the most part, hitters fluctuate in April. Strong starts don’t seem to be built into hitters’ DNA.
Table 2: Slow Staring Hitters: 2009-2013
April Rank by OPS |
||||||
Player |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
Average |
181 |
189 |
185 |
||||
185 |
179 |
184 |
182.67 |
|||
191 |
185 |
129 |
168.333 |
|||
190 |
147 |
164 |
169 |
167.5 |
||
152 |
178 |
165 |
||||
193 |
132 |
162.5 |
||||
124 |
188 |
156 |
||||
183 |
179 |
117 |
178 |
116 |
154.6 |
|
90 |
170 |
177 |
179 |
154 |
||
128 |
173 |
93 |
171 |
181 |
149.2 |
|
185 |
71 |
116 |
183 |
138.75 |
||
101 |
186 |
175 |
93 |
138.75 |
||
183 |
86 |
137 |
135.33 |
|||
82 |
185 |
133.5 |
||||
182 |
99 |
72 |
167 |
130 |
||
93 |
111 |
190 |
121 |
128.75 |
||
105 |
82 |
179 |
122 |
|||
62 |
182 |
122 |
||||
131 |
188 |
81 |
83 |
120.75 |
||
187 |
42 |
114.5 |
||||
Raul Ibanez |
4 |
137 |
192 |
111 |
||
95 |
86 |
143 |
108 |
|||
157 |
80 |
191 |
62 |
49 |
107.8 |
|
35 |
176 |
105.5 |
||||
192 |
11 |
101.5 |
||||
67 |
20 |
132 |
185 |
101 |
||
189 |
100 |
54 |
35 |
113 |
98.2 |
|
143 |
24 |
194 |
29 |
97.5 |
||
Mark Reynolds |
70 |
32 |
173 |
183 |
8 |
93.2 |
Vernon Wells |
97 |
7 |
193 |
123 |
27 |
89.4 |
28 |
187 |
41 |
94 |
87.5 |
||
Edwin Encarnacion |
194 |
7 |
58 |
86.33 |
||
42 |
19 |
151 |
18 |
187 |
83.4 |
On the whole, there are more hitters whose slow starts plague them season after season then there are fast starters who consistently come out of the gate on fire. Some of these players are fringe options like Brendan Ryan whose final offensive numbers aren’t going to be palatable in any format. However, there are a few players toward the top of this chart who aren’t very good at the beginning of the season yet ultimately do offer some value to their fantasy owners. It is fair to characterize J.J. Hardy and Alexei Ramirez as slow starters, but you do want to own them at some point during the season, even in a mixed format.
B.J. Upton might be the best example of this phenomenon. If you have owned Upton year in and year out, while his slow start this year still stung, you’ve probably been patient and have some vague memory of him doing this before. If not, you might have been more likely to ditch him in your 12-team mixer. But Upton is almost always a slow starter, and does improve as the season moves along.
Table 3: Fast Starting Pitchers: 2009-2013
April Rank by ERA |
||||||
Player |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
Average |
8 |
4 |
9 |
29 |
12.5 |
||
10 |
16 |
13 |
||||
2 |
17 |
25 |
14.67 |
|||
17 |
27 |
2 |
21 |
16.75 |
||
10 |
23 |
25 |
19.33 |
|||
35 |
5 |
20 |
||||
5 |
8 |
45 |
27 |
21.25 |
||
7 |
38 |
22.5 |
||||
3 |
42 |
22.5 |
||||
50 |
2 |
26 |
||||
36 |
52 |
14 |
8 |
27.5 |
||
69 |
7 |
12 |
44 |
33 |
||
3 |
69 |
3 |
59 |
33.5 |
||
1 |
28 |
72 |
33.67 |
|||
84 |
6 |
14 |
34.67 |
|||
13 |
86 |
8 |
35.67 |
|||
4 |
51 |
77 |
13 |
36.25 |
||
10 |
63 |
36.5 |
||||
41 |
44 |
10 |
58 |
35 |
37.6 |
|
42 |
13 |
9 |
17 |
107 |
37.6 |
|
20 |
39 |
1 |
95 |
38.75 |
||
2 |
82 |
42 |
||||
84 |
4 |
44 |
||||
86 |
2 |
44 |
||||
33 |
6 |
29 |
100 |
59 |
45.4 |
|
92 |
3 |
42 |
45.67 |
|||
53 |
66 |
64 |
43 |
4 |
46 |
|
76 |
5 |
70 |
34 |
46.25 |
||
7 |
87 |
47 |
||||
9 |
56 |
48 |
28 |
106 |
49.4 |
|
23 |
8 |
69 |
106 |
51.5 |
||
6 |
98 |
52 |
||||
92 |
112 |
5 |
1 |
52.5 |
||
5 |
103 |
54 |
||||
90 |
91 |
55 |
30 |
8 |
54.8 |
|
102 |
10 |
56 |
||||
21 |
96 |
110 |
3 |
57.5 |
||
1 |
114 |
57.5 |
||||
9 |
109 |
59 |
||||
36 |
95 |
108 |
1 |
92 |
66.4 |
Fewer pitchers qualify in April for multiple seasons, so it is harder to make definitive conclusions from Table 3. Kyle Lohse can be classified as a fast starter based on his April performances, and in the years that he qualifies Doug Fister can be put in this category as well. But because so many pitchers don’t qualify, there are a significant number of two- or three-year pitchers on this list. Is Ross Detwiler going to be a fast starter? Perhaps… but we need to see more than two years of data to be sure.
But, once again, there are a number of one-year outliers on this list. Anibal Sanchez’s 2013 isn’t in line with the previous four years. Trevor Cahill’s 2011 is the outlier, and so is Joe Saunders’ 2012. Jake Westbrook has had two strong Aprils in a row, but my guess is that this means nothing, and the fact that he is at the bottom of this table supports this notion.
Table 4: Slow Starting Pitchers: 2009-2013
April Rank by ERA |
||||||
Player |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
Average |
87 |
112 |
76 |
107 |
95.5 |
||
96 |
90 |
93 |
||||
100 |
71 |
108 |
93 |
|||
110 |
87 |
63 |
86.67 |
|||
51 |
106 |
94 |
83.67 |
|||
57 |
102 |
64 |
105 |
82 |
||
97 |
108 |
22 |
80 |
83 |
78 |
|
64 |
52 |
115 |
77 |
|||
99 |
89 |
57 |
62 |
76.75 |
||
14 |
105 |
107 |
53 |
103 |
76.4 |
|
64 |
63 |
109 |
67 |
75.75 |
||
29 |
107 |
67 |
99 |
75.5 |
||
22 |
97 |
104 |
74.33 |
|||
36 |
112 |
74 |
||||
35 |
111 |
73 |
||||
70 |
56 |
53 |
111 |
72.5 |
||
28 |
77 |
91 |
60 |
104 |
72 |
|
78 |
104 |
54 |
51 |
71.75 |
||
25 |
45 |
104 |
103 |
72 |
69.8 |
|
75 |
86 |
105 |
13 |
69.75 |
||
110 |
26 |
68 |
||||
113 |
21 |
67 |
||||
72 |
33 |
116 |
45 |
66.5 |
||
Joe Saunders |
36 |
95 |
108 |
1 |
92 |
66.4 |
20 |
109 |
64.5 |
||||
80 |
111 |
11 |
55 |
64.25 |
||
93 |
60 |
45 |
55 |
61 |
62.8 |
|
67 |
78 |
18 |
101 |
37 |
60.2 |
|
Brad Penny |
9 |
109 |
59 |
|||
Clay Buchholz |
21 |
96 |
110 |
3 |
57.5 |
|
Mike Pelfrey |
1 |
114 |
57.5 |
|||
Mat Latos |
102 |
10 |
56 |
|||
Jair Jurrjens |
5 |
103 |
54 |
|||
Jake Westbrook |
92 |
112 |
5 |
1 |
52.5 |
|
John Danks |
23 |
8 |
69 |
106 |
51.5 |
|
38 |
42 |
15 |
108 |
50.75 |
||
Matt Cain |
9 |
56 |
48 |
28 |
106 |
49.4 |
Livan Hernandez |
92 |
3 |
42 |
45.67 |
||
Roy Halladay |
42 |
13 |
9 |
17 |
107 |
37.6 |
If you want “evidence” that fast starts and slow starts aren’t predictable, all you need to do is look at the repeaters on Tables 3 and 4. A few pitchers appear on both lists. Sometimes you eat the bear and sometimes the bear eats you.
For the most part, the pitchers at the top of the chart haven’t been very good. Rick Porcello certainly has potential, but it’s not as if the memory of his terrible Aprils has been erased by solid numbers the rest of the way. Aaron Cook, Joe Blanton, and J.A. Happ are not pitchers that are subject to poor Aprils followed by excellent bounce-back years. These aren’t pitchers that are merely poor at the beginning of the year but rather poor performers overall. There is no tactical advantage to knowing that these guys don’t pitch well in April.
There are also some pitchers on this list who have been categorized as slow starters even though there isn’t enough data to say this is so. Mat Latos had a slow start in 2012, but didn’t throw enough innings in any prior Aprils for us to say whether this is a trend or not, and his 2013 tells a completely different story. Max Scherzer is another pitcher who is often put into the slow-starts crowd. While he has never come out of the gate strong, only his 2012 can truly be categorized as a bad April; the rest of his Aprils have merely been pedestrian.
Conclusions
The concept of the fast start/slow start is something that isn’t just embraced by the fantasy layperson but by many fantasy experts as well. I have been guilty of doing this also. For years, I assumed that there was something to the idea that there was a significant core of players who were slow starters and fast starters.
However, the data do not support this notion. Only a very small handful of players fall into the category of consistent or perennial fast or slow starters. In the case of the best hitters and the worst pitchers, these players aren’t fast starters who decline or slow starters who improve, but players whose “fast” or “slow” starts are consistent with what they do the rest of the season.
The mythology of slow and fast starters is strong enough that despite the evidence or the lack of evidence, players who are not truly fast or slow starters are lumped into this category. This is truer of slow starters than fast starters, as fantasy owners are always looking to avoid poor performances at any cost.
There are a handful of annual slow starters who improve as the regular season moves forward. In mixed leagues, these players can probably sit on your bench while you wait for the calendar to turn and for these players to improve.
On the whole, the slow start/fast start concept is a canard: a lazy myth embraced to explain away bad performance that is not indicative of a player’s “typical” April but rather a bad month that isn’t predictive of performance in future Aprils. It is best to ignore broad declarative statements that say, “this player is a slow starter” or “this player is a fast starter” unless you have the numbers to back it up.
Thank you for reading
This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.
Subscribe now
One of the most notorious of slow starters is someone not even on your list - Mark Teixeira. He has an April OPS approximately 160 points lower than the rest of the season. Now he isn't terrible in April on the whole, but he isn't Mark Teixeira, so if you own him, you shouldn't worry if he has a relatively slow start. The same is true of Ramirez, only it often extends through May - he's a warm weather hitter, better times will come.
As for LaRoche, well, not quite the Easter Bunny. What he is is a player who is very consistent from year to year, but radically inconsistent within seasons. More often than not, this is manifested in horrendous starts. Despite those three good Aprils, he has a career BA of .212 in April, with an OPS approximately 150 points lower than the rest of the season. Armed with that knowledge, smart LaRoche owners know to be patient, that these starts happen. But perhaps his owner in your league wasn't that knowledgeable, purchasing LaRoche just based on his terrific 2012. It is quite possible you could have bought low, knowing that .136/.213/.259 triple slash line for him was just one of those Aprils he has had in the past and rebounded from. By the way, you went back five years, but in 2008 he hit .163 in April, and in 2007 he hit .133.
Thanks for reading and for commenting.
The tables aren't comparing April performance for all players. The tables list all players who had at least one Top 10 or Bottom 10 qualifying April in OPS or ERA and then list how these players did in at least one other qualifying April. Brendan Ryan is not being compared to Aramis Ramirez. Brendan Ryan is being compared to Brendan Ryan, Aramis Ramirez is being compared to Aramis Ramirez, etc.
If you compare Aramis Ramirez to Aramis Ramirez, since 2000, five of his Aprils have been above his seasonal OPS and eight of his April have been below his seasonal OPS. In one sense, Ramirez is a slow starter, in that his career OPS in April is below his career OPS for the entire season. However, if you refused to draft or buy Aramis or benched him in April because he is a slow starter, you lose that bet 38% of the time.
Most of the perception that Aramis is a terrible April/May hitter comes from his lousy 2010 start. That season, Aramis had a 498 OPS in April and a 494 in May. This start is an extreme outlier and not representative of Aramis's typical start. The problem with using career numbers (as you do above) and saying that "Aramis is a slow starter" is that you're willingly taking an extreme outlier from one campaign and including it in the overall data.
As for LaRoche, he has had five seasons where his April OPS was below his seasonal OPS...but four seasons where his April OPS was above his seasonal OPS. LaRoche's overall April OPS is lower but - again - he isn't consistently worse in April year in and year out (I didn't stop at five seasons to selectively make LaRoche look better in this analysis).
Players' performances fluctuate. Every April is a small sample size and two arbitrary endpoints. It hardly surprises me that I found that one bad April isn't predictive of another bad one...even though conventional wisdom says otherwise. Comparing Aramis to Aramis or LaRoche to LaRoche doesn't change the results...although I'm glad you brought this to my attention, as this is yet another intriguing way to look at the fallacy of slow and fast starters.