To read the previous editions in this series, follow the links below:
We’re in the middle of a pitching-dominated era, which is somewhat highlighted by the depth at the position. If we rewind to 10 years ago we likely wouldn’t have any one-star options that would look even moderately appealing. As it stands now there’s a lot of interesting stuff going on toward the bottom. I broke the graphs down into three; let’s take a look at them:
There are a few things to consider with pitchers. Health is a primary concern with all of these guys, as book-version PECOTA is hyper-conservative with the upper limits on innings, which in turn limits the Win and K projections. Still, you do see a clear separation between guys. Kershaw is the best pitcher available as he provides elite production across all four categories (the only pitcher that can boast that claim). Yu Darvish isn’t too far behind, and if he stays healthy this year he might become a legitimate first-round candidate come next season.
Paul Sporer was bullish on Gerrit Cole and while the book was conservative with his IP totals, he’s definitely an option to consider after the elite of the elite are gone. PECOTA likes CC Sabathia, but I’m less optimistic. He’s lost a few ticks off his fastball and there are a lot of high-leverage innings on that arm. Masahiro Tanaka is expected to have a pretty successful debut as the book thinks he’ll provide good production across three categories. I think Ivan Nova is underrated by PECOTA a bit, and he’s a breakout candidate for me.
Jose Quintana remains a bland pitcher who won’t kill you, but he’s not going to be much more than an SP4 in most leagues. PECOTA has a really rosy projection for Yovani Gallardo. I think he might help in ERA and WHIP, but I think the days of top-shelf K production from him are gone. Down among the one-stars, Edwin Jackson is expected to rebound, which should make Bret Sayre very happy. I think Taijuan Walker will pitch all year and outpitch his projections as well; I’d go gray across all four categories for him. And then there’s Ian Kennedy, who was a severe disappointment last year. I think he’s an interesting rebound candidate and there’s a good chance PECOTA has him nailed here.
For the curious here are the stat bins:
W |
|
Tier 1 |
12+ |
Tier 2 |
10-11 |
Tier 3 |
9 |
Tier 4 |
7-8 |
Tier 5 |
6- |
K |
|
Tier 1 |
174+ |
Tier 2 |
146-173 |
Tier 3 |
118-145 |
Tier 4 |
90-117 |
Tier 5 |
89- |
WHIP |
|
Tier 1 |
1.44+ |
Tier 2 |
1.33-1.43 |
Tier 3 |
1.23-1.32 |
Tier 4 |
1.10-1.22 |
Tier 5 |
1.11- |
ERA |
|
Tier 1 |
4.8+ |
Tier 2 |
4.18-4.79 |
Tier 3 |
3.59-4.17 |
Tier 4 |
2.97-3.58 |
Tier 5 |
2.96- |
Thank you for reading
This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.
Subscribe now
Cole Hamels
It took me a moment figure it out.
when many on the listing below(3 stars) have all pink or pink and red? There are other obvious flaws in the listings if you base it on the tiers for each of the categories.
"With this infographic specifically, you’ll notice that there are some odd pairings within the tiers. There is no specific rank within the tiers themselves, and this was made to mirrorMike Gianella’s list of catchers. So, you’ll get a guy likeWilson Ramos ahead of Jason Castro for that reason."
Replace Mike's name with Paul's and the catchers with pitchers. Â
4 STAR listings:
Sanchez (4 Tier 3s)
Cobb ( 2 Tier 4 ) (2 Tier 3)
While in the 3 Star listings we have:
Minor ( 4 Tier 2)
Medlen (1 tier 1, 1 Tier 2, 2Tier 3)
Sabathia (1 Tier 1, 3 Tier 2)
Tanaka ( 3 Tier 2, 1 Tier 3)
Are some of these 3 star guys misplaced or is there another explanation?
They directly relate to those rankings.
are sveral other questionable.
If you're wondering why they're in that tier, it's worth asking Mike on his article so that he can respond. Mauricio can't necessarily answer why Mike put guys in specific tiers.
Mr. Gianella put the pitchers into the various tiers based on some process (subjective?, analytical? or other?) which is undefined for the reader. His perception is that Cobb and Sanchez are 4 star pitchers.
Mr. Rubio took Mr. Gianella's lists and put his own perceptions in each of the 4 categories. He happens to believe the Minor, Medlen, Sabathia have more value in the four categories then Sanchez or Cobb and shows that with the various colors ( tiers) assigned.
Bottom line: relative value is based on the perception of the evaluator. Sometimes there is agreement - like Kershaw- often there is not.