In this week’s mailbag, we’ll investigate pitching matchups that involved players with long surnames, Cy Young winners who were actually better in the year that followed their award-winning campaigns, and the most productive players selected among the top 50 picks of the Rule 4 draft. As always, if you have a question you would like to see answered in this space, please send me an email (remember to include your name and hometown).
The last names of Sunday’s starting pitchers, Jordan Zimmerman and Jeff Samardzija, total 20 characters. What game has featured the most characters in the last names of the starting pitchers?
Andrew Davis
Port St. Lucie, Florida
William "The Launching Pad" Van Landingham made 81 starts for the San Francisco Giants between 1994 and 1997 before injuries ended his career at the age of 28. There is some debate as to whether his last name counts as 13 or 14 characters, however. Major League Baseball lists his name with a space between “Van” and “Landingham,” but Baseball Reference removes the space. We’ll go with MLB’s version for the purpose of answering Andrew’s question.
On May 29, 1996, Van Landingham squared off against the Mets’ Jason Isringhausen, marking the only time in baseball history that the last names of a game’s starting pitchers have totaled 26 characters. Van Landingham’s matchups against Todd Stottlemyre in 1996 and 1997 are the only times pitchers have combined for 25 characters.
Date |
Away Pitcher |
Team |
Home Pitcher |
Team |
Length |
5/29/96 |
Giants |
Jason Isringhausen |
Mets |
26 |
|
5/25/97 |
Todd Stottlemyre |
Cardinals |
William Van Landingham |
Giants |
25 |
6/8/96 |
Todd Stottlemyre |
Cardinals |
William Van Landingham |
Giants |
25 |
4/12/10 |
Athletics |
Mariners |
24 |
||
4/7/10 |
Ryan Rowland-Smith |
Mariners |
Justin Duchscherer |
Athletics |
24 |
9/3/58 |
Orioles |
Senators |
24 |
||
8/11/58 |
Red Sox |
Vito Valentinetti |
Senators |
24 |
|
8/1/53 |
Giants |
Reds |
24 |
||
5/30/50 |
Ken Raffensberger |
Reds |
Cubs |
24 |
How often do Cy Young winners improve the following season?
Sam Miller
Orange County, California
I debated a number of ways to define year-over-year improvement, including True Average (TAv) against, Fair Run Average Plus (FRA+), and Wins Above Replacement (WARP). In the end, I decided to use all three.
Only twice since 1960 has a pitcher improved his TAv against, FRA+, and WARP in the season after winning the Cy Young Award. In 1970, Tom Seaver defended his National League Cy Young by lowering his TAv against by .011, increasing his FRA+ by 25 points, and more than doubling his WARP from the previous season. Despite improving his advanced statistics across the board, Seaver finished only seventh in Cy Young balloting in 1970.
Year |
TAv Against |
FRA+ |
Comments |
|
1969 |
.231 |
106 |
3.69 |
Won NL Cy Young |
1970 |
.220 |
131 |
8.30 |
Placed 7th in NL Cy Young |
It took nearly a quarter-century for another pitcher to replicate Seaver’s feat, but Jack McDowell did just that in the strike-shortened 1994 season. Like Seaver, McDowell received very little recognition for improving upon his Cy Young winning campaign in 1993, receiving no award votes in 1994.
Year |
TAv Against |
FRA+ |
Comments |
|
1993 |
.248 |
102 |
2.47 |
Won AL Cy Young |
1994 |
.237 |
120 |
3.36 |
Received no Cy Young votes |
I enjoyed your article this week about teams using their draft picks efficiently. Can you tell us which players have achieved the most major-league success by overall draft pick?
George Lincoln
Terre Haute, Indiana
Let’s take a look at the top 50 picks in the draft and the players who have accrued the most WARP:
Overall |
Year |
Name |
|
1 |
1993 |
105.4 |
|
2 |
1966 |
81.6 |
|
3 |
1977 |
77.5 |
|
4 |
1973 |
70.8 |
|
5 |
1982 |
52.0 |
|
6 |
1985 |
160.7 |
|
7 |
1989 |
72.3 |
|
8 |
1995 |
57.3 |
|
9 |
1987 |
40.1 |
|
10 |
1967 |
59.6 |
|
11 |
1968 |
30.7 |
|
12 |
1994 |
46.3 |
|
13 |
1991 |
74.7 |
|
14 |
1993 |
31.5 |
|
15 |
1971 |
45.9 |
|
16 |
1997 |
55.6 |
|
17 |
1995 |
38.3 |
|
18 |
1974 |
46.9 |
|
19 |
1983 |
103.4 |
|
20 |
1990 |
60.1 |
|
21 |
1974 |
29.0 |
|
22 |
1987 |
59.8 |
|
23 |
1992 |
47.6 |
|
24 |
1990 |
24.4 |
|
25 |
1989 |
28.9 |
|
26 |
1976 |
54.3 |
|
27 |
1967 |
37.2 |
|
28 |
1975 |
29.2 |
|
29 |
1971 |
92.9 |
|
30 |
1971 |
116.7 |
|
31 |
1984 |
84.0 |
|
32 |
1983 |
20.0 |
|
33 |
1987 |
26.5 |
|
34 |
1981 |
22.9 |
|
35 |
1992 |
50.4 |
|
36 |
1985 |
90.7 |
|
37 |
1981 |
33.7 |
|
38 |
2001 |
37.1 |
|
39 |
1967 |
38.0 |
|
40 |
1986 |
27.1 |
|
41 |
1973 |
48.1 |
|
42 |
1977 |
23.7 |
|
43 |
1972 |
15.5 |
|
44 |
1992 |
23.5 |
|
45 |
1998 |
5.0 |
|
46 |
1993 |
64.6 |
|
47 |
1984 |
63.3 |
|
48 |
1978 |
72.2 |
|
49 |
1995 |
53.9 |
|
50 |
1972 |
53.3 |
Thank you for reading
This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.
Subscribe now
In the true spirit of the question, wouldn't using ERA+ instead of FRA+ be better?
More likely than not, a pitcher who wins the Cy Young has some luck factors on their side. While some do improve their underlying statistics, how many of them truly improved enough to overcome regression to the mean the next year?