Last weekend we posted “Hitter Profiles,” which let you look at PITCHf/x data for each hitter in MLB filtered by a bunch of different attributes. Today, we’re posting their companion piece, “Pitcher Profiles.” You can search for pitchers here. As we did for the Hitter Profiles, we’ll be adding a dropdown link to the search interface from the “Statistics” tab on the nav bar at the top of the page.
We think these profiles will revolutionize the way people look at PITCHf/x data. Location is perhaps the most important attribute of a pitch, and the Pitcher Profiles allow you to examine the results of pitches across multiple spatial locations. PITCHf/x data has been available for five years, but we haven’t been able to examine it this way, at least publicly. (There are scouting services that provide this kind of data.) It was the first thing that a scout I talked to asked for.
To help remind you of what each pitcher throws, we’ve posted the basic PITCHf/x data above the profile chart. Because this table is currently hosted within our player cards at Brooks Baseball, it might take a second longer to load than the profile below (though this issue will be remedied very shortly). As before, all of this pitch data is pulled directly from the Pitch Info LLC database, so you can be confident in the quality of the custom pitch classifications.
You should also know that the outside-the-zone locations are more or less “to scale” with the rest of the plot and do not extend to infinity (or the ground). So, the absolute numbers of pitches will be different between the two tables, especially for pitch types that are often buried in the dirt (these buried pitches are not included in our profile). We thought this was the best trade-off, because it presents the most relevant data: what happens in and around the strike zone (this is also true of our hitter cards). Also, because different batters are different heights, the vertical zone locations are generated using ex-BPer Mike Fast’s formula for batter height.
We think there are plenty of fun and informative things to look at with this new tool. For example, look at where two sinkerballers locate to LHH by comparing Justin Masterson’s pitch frequency to Derek Lowe’s pitch frequency, and then switch over to TAv to see their results at those locations. Look at the results on Jon Lester’s cutter when he leaves it out over the plate and when he’s trying to bust RHH inside. Look at how often Jonathan Papelbon elevates his fastball. And see how much power hitters generate when Justin Verlander grooves a pitch:
Your feedback on the Hitter Profiles was extremely helpful. Because of your comments, we increased the number of sortable statistics to 19 and added several multi-sort options for pitch groupings, first/second half, etc. Please provide feedback for the Pitcher Profiles, and we’ll try to incorporate as many of your changes as possible.
Thank you for reading
This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.
Subscribe now
Yes, the Pitcher Profiles will be added to the tab soon.
Over 40% of his opponents at bats which conclude with a pitch up in the zone represent a foul out ("Foul Rate"). (It'd be great to get this compared to the league average).
Over 25% of his pitches beneath the strike zone result in a whiff per "Whiff Rate".
The pitches where, according to ISO, he gets punished on are the middle and down-left section of the strike zone.
He is "BABIP"-luckiest in the top left and top section of the strike zone. He is "BABIP"-unluckiest in the down right section of the strike zone.
And all that with about five minutes of flipping through charts.
I also like the chart at the top that describes each type of pitch.
Does the zone stuff only have end-of-at-bat data or does it have every single pitch?
Are we saying that Garza has thrown only 521 pitches in that portion of the strike zone from 2007 to 2012? And that 226 of those pitches were fouled off?
Then, if I swing to "Swing Rate", I see 73.7% and 521/707.
Then, if I switch to "Whiff Rate" I see 8.4% and 44/521.
What's the difference between 707 and 521? Hit balls that weren't foul balls?
Back to Garza's center section:
GB: 80/255
LD: 53/255
FB: 97/255
PU: 25/255
GB/FB: 80/97
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/pitchfx/pitcher_profiles/pitcher_profiles.php?player=490063&month=&year=&throws=&pi_type=&report=count&color=
He's thrown 707 balls in the center.
If we switch to Swing Rate:
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/pitchfx/pitcher_profiles/pitcher_profiles.php?player=490063&month=&year=&throws=&pi_type=&report=swing&color=
We see that there have been 521 swings on those 707 pitches.
If we switch to foul rate:
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/pitchfx/pitcher_profiles/pitcher_profiles.php?player=490063&month=&year=&throws=&pi_type=&report=foul&color=
We see that 226 of those 521 swings have been foul balls.
If we switch to whiff rate:
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/pitchfx/pitcher_profiles/pitcher_profiles.php?player=490063&month=&year=&throws=&pi_type=&report=whiff&color=
We see that 44 of those 521 swings have been swings and misses.
Make sense now? =)
Might be useful to add "Balls in Play Rate" (Hits+Outs in Play) and a "Hit Rate" (Hits) and "Balls in Play Out Rate" (Outs that aren't strikeouts or foul outs)
It also has a huge ISO.
His sinker has lost 1.5 mph this year. Fluke thing or has his sinker suddenly become eminently hittable?