Tigers in ’04.
Tigers in ’04?
Tigers in ’04!
Yesterday’s signing of Ivan Rodriguez means that you have to at least consider the Tigers’ chances of making noise in the American League Central this year. Although they’re coming off a 43-win season in which they chased some of the game’s most ignominious numbers, they’ve upgraded four positions over the winter and added a credible mid-rotation starter.
It’s easy to look at a team like the Tigers and evaluate them just in terms of how much better they’ve become. For example:
2004 PECOTA 2003 performance AVG OBP SLG VORP AVG OBP SLG VORP Ivan Rodriguez .285 .347 .465 35.4 Brandon Inge .203 .265 .339 -9.9 Fernando Vina .265 .318 .363 12.4 Warren Morris .272 .316 .373 8.4 Carlos Guillen .258 .336 .380 21.4 Ram. Santiago .225 .292 .284 -10.9 Rondell White .264 .321 .429 10.4 Craig Monroe .240 .287 .449 2.0 IP ERA VORP IP ERA VORP Jason Johnson 158.0 4.83 11.8 Gary Knotts 95.3 6.04 -11.3
Those comparisons aren’t perfect; Gary Knotts didn’t pitch as much as Jason Johnson is projected to, for one, and none of the Tigers’ new players is projected to qualify for the batting or ERA titles. If Fernando Vina, Carlos Guillen and Rondell White persist in missing parts of the season, as they usually do, the playing time they don’t use will be handed to the sub-replacement-level players they’ve been brought in to replace.
Still, by this standard the Tigers could be as much as 11 wins better just based on these upgrades. Keeping in mind that they were a "true" 49-win team in 2003 (falling six games short of their projected, or Pythagorean record, based on runs scored and allowed), you can project 15-20 games of improvement even before considering the possibility that the returning players will get better.
That’s certainly a worthy achievement, but it’s more important to evaluate the Tigers in terms of what they are now, comparing them not to their wretched performance of a year ago, but to their competition. Are the Tigers really comparable to the Twins, White Sox, and Royals, or even the Indians?
The Tigers might have the best position player in the division at as many as four spots, and their lineup and top bench guys compare reasonably well to what the rest of the division is running out there:
Tigers Royals Twins Indians White Sox C Rodriguez Santiago LeCroy Martinez Olivo 1B Pena Sweeney M'kiewicz Broussard Konerko 2B Vina Relaford Rivas Belliard Harris 3B Munson Randa Koskie Blake Crede SS Guillen Berroa Guzman Vizquel Valentin LF White Stairs Stewart Lawton Lee CF Sanchez Beltran Hunter Bradley Rowand RF Higginson Gonzalez Jones Gerut Ordonez DH Young Harvey Cuddyer Hafner Thomas Bench1 Monroe Graffanino Ford Ludwick Uribe Bench2 Shelton Pickering Morneau Crisp Benard VORP* 176.6 145.8 200.0 146.6 186.2 *PECOTA-projected
Four? Give them Rodriguez, and reasonable arguments at second base and shortstop in a division that doesn’t have even one good double-play tandem. Dmitri Young out-hit Frank Thomas last year, so it’s not unreasonable to think he can do it again.
That’s only half the game, of course.
Tigers Royals Twins Indians White Sox SP1 Maroth May Radke Sabathia Buehrle SP2 Cornejo Anderson Santana Davis Loaiza SP3 Johnson Appier Lohse Lee Garland SP4 Bonderman Affeldt Balfour Stanford Schoeneweis SP5 Robertson Gobble Mays Westbrook Rauch RP1 Rodney Sullivan Nathan Riske Marte RP2 Levine Leskanic Romero Betancourt Koch RP3 German MacDougal Rincon Stewart Wunsch VORP* 56.7 120.6 138.6 96.9 138.0 *PECOTA-projected Total 233.3 266.4 338.6 246.5 324.2
Whoops. Even with the addition of Jason Johnson and some projected improvement by Jeremy Bonderman, the Tigers look to have the worst pitching in the division, and it’s not terribly close. It’s enough of a deficit to make them look, once again, like the division’s patsies.
They’re not going to make up that ground with glovework. The Tigers have a pretty good defensive infield, especially if Guillen and Vina can play 140 games each. The outfield, however, is hampered by having Alex Sanchez, a fast man who doesn’t track balls well or have a good arm, in center field. Their defense should be in the middle of the pack in this group, not nearly enough of an edge over the White Sox to make them a factor in the race, although it’s good enough to perhaps close the gap between them and the division’s second tier.
So the question is, if the Tigers can’t reasonably be expected to make a run in ’04, what was the point? Why commit so much money to the pursuit of 70 wins?
Sometimes, what makes the most sense for the long-term aspirations of the baseball team has to take a back seat to the need to run the business. The Tigers have put four lousy baseball teams into Comerica Park, watching attendance dwindle each season as the honeymoon ended and Detroit’s baseball fans abandoned a noncompetitive, boring team.
By spending some money, and acquiring major league-caliber players, the Tigers have made a good-faith effort to bring people back to the park. Of their new acquisitions, only Rodriguez required more than a two-year commitment (and even his deal has buyouts strewn through it), and none of the new players are blocking top prospects. The shame of the Randy Smith era isn’t the Tigers’ lack of competitiveness throughout the post-strike era; it’s the fact that in 2004, the Tigers can sign Vina and White and Johnson and Rodriguez and have them not be blocking anyone of note.
If those players can just meet expectations, the Tigers will be much easier on the eyes. Maybe this team still isn’t as good as the Twins, White Sox and Royals, but it’s good enough to provide the blessed "hope and faith" to its fans. I can see the Tigers hanging around .500 for a while, maybe getting to the All-Star break within a half-dozen games of first place. That would make them a heck of a story, and perhaps energize the fan base for the 2005 and 2006 seasons, when center fielder Curtis Granderson, right-hander Joel Zumaya, and 2003 #1 Kyle Sleeth could be ready for the majors.
Tigers in ’04? Probably not, but give Mike Ilitch and Dave Dombrowski credit for at least forcing people to consider the notion, just four months after their team set the American League record for losses.
Thank you for reading
This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.
Subscribe now