To read the previous articles in this series, follow the links below:
- Fantasy Tier Rankings: Catchers
- Fantasy Tier Rankings: First Base
- Fantasy Tier Rankings: Second Base
- Fantasy Tier Rankings: Third Base
Today, our positional tier rankings series continues with a look at shortstops.
Players at each position are divided into five tiers, represented by a numerical star rating. Five-star players are the studs at their respective position. In general, they are the players who will be nabbed in the first couple of rounds of the draft, and they'll fetch auction bids in excess of $30. Four-star players are a cut below the studs at the position. They will also be early-round selections, and they are projected to be worth more than $20 in most cases. Three-star players are the last tier in which players are projected to provide double-digit dollar value in auctions, and two-star players are projected to earn single digits in dollar value in auctions. One-star players are late round sleepers and roster placeholders. The positional tiers aren't simply a regurgitation of last year’s values but rather try to offer some insights into what we expect will happen in 2014.
We retained last year's roster requirements for the positional tier series. Dollar values come from this year’s PFM using a 12-team, standard 5×5 scoring format, with 23-man rosters and the following positions: C (2) 1B (1) 2B (1) 3B (1) SS (1) CI (1) MI (1) OF (5) UT (1) P (9). The minimum bid for players is $1, and, as we did last year, we allocate $180 of a $260 budget to hitters. Players needed to play in 20 games at a position to qualify there. The PFM is customizable, so if your league uses a different format, you can adjust it to match your league settings and see how it impacts players’ dollar values.
Players with multi-position eligibility are listed at the position where it is most likely they would start in a standard fantasy league. Anyone with shortstop eligibility will appear in this series. While you might insert Ben Zobrist into your outfield at some point during the season due to an injury, it is unlikely you would use him there at the start of the season.
Five Star
Player |
Team |
Mixed $ |
AL/NL $ |
R |
|||||
COL |
$20.75 |
$23.03 |
520 |
72 |
25 |
83 |
3 |
.305 |
|
WAS |
$16.04 |
$22.33 |
611 |
71 |
16 |
68 |
22 |
.261 |
It could be argued that there are no more elite shortstops in baseball, but the flattening out of the position—along with offense on the whole—pushes both Tulo and Desmond into the elite tier. Whether you prefer Tulowitzki or Desmond depends on the size of your league and your risk/reward proposition. Tulo is the no-brainer in standard and shallower mixed leagues, as even 100 games of Tulo combined with 60 games of a replacement level player could make a huge difference. Desmond is the consistent guy you want in deeper mixed and NL-only. He puts up solid numbers across the board and only his batting average keeps him from being a Top 10 overall draft pick.
Five-Star Value Pick: Ian Desmond
Neither player is truly a “value pick” but Desmond is showing up four slots lower than Tulowitzki in ADP and is the better bet of the two players to play 130-plus games.
Four Star
Player |
Team |
Mixed $ |
AL/NL $ |
PA |
R |
HR |
RBI |
SB |
AVG |
BOS |
$19.05 |
$21.37 |
580 |
74 |
18 |
71 |
18 |
.275 |
|
TOR |
$26.63 |
$24.98 |
652 |
84 |
11 |
60 |
29 |
.286 |
|
CHW |
$7.70 |
$17.23 |
620 |
62 |
9 |
59 |
21 |
.266 |
|
CHC |
$7.50 |
$17.62 |
630 |
63 |
9 |
64 |
11 |
.277 |
Unlike other positions, the rankings at shortstop get messy and muddled in a hurry. With the exception of Hanley, any of these players could be ranked below in the three-star tier, while some of the three-star players could be ranked in the four-star group. There are so many decisions! Hanley stands out due to his power/speed combination. The temptation is going to be the push him into the five star tier anticipating a big Fenway benefit, but the health and recent performance history say to pump the brakes a little bit.
PECOTA loves Reyes—projecting him to earn $6 more than the second-best player (Tulo) at the position—but the separation in 2014 between Reyes and lesser players like Alcides Escobar and Danny Santana wasn’t particularly significant. He gets the nod here because of his consistency, but Reyes’s ISO has dropped slightly every season since 2011 and while the speed is nice he is unlikely to produce at a 40-plus-SB clip now that he is on the wrong side of 30.
Four-Star Value Pick: Starlin Castro
It is a fairly typical pattern in fantasy (and real) baseball: a player breaks through early, is hyped as an elite or near-elite player for 3-4 years, fails to live up to that level of performance, and is panned as a disappointment even though the numbers overall are solid. Castro will be a 25 years old on Opening Day; he has held his own as a major leaguer and there is still room for improvement. After watching Castro go too early in drafts for the last 2-3 years, he is now going a little too late. At worst, Castro’s 2013 looks like a blip on the radar and you should get a .285-.290 batting average with 15 home runs and solid all-around production.
Three Star
Player |
Team |
Mixed $ |
AL/NL $ |
PA |
R |
HR |
RBI |
SB |
AVG |
TEX |
$14.05 |
$19.04 |
674 |
78 |
2 |
44 |
31 |
.269 |
|
OAK |
$8.89 |
$14.35 |
637 |
77 |
10 |
56 |
11 |
.254 |
|
Alcides Escobar |
KC |
$10.96 |
$18.04 |
672 |
73 |
4 |
46 |
30 |
.259 |
MIL |
$8.42 |
$19.89 |
561 |
64 |
8 |
49 |
29 |
.268 |
|
BOS |
$1.00 |
$11.62 |
561 |
60 |
14 |
61 |
3 |
.255 |
|
LAA |
$0.42 |
$12.84 |
566 |
57 |
6 |
48 |
16 |
.265 |
|
STL |
$1.35 |
$13.85 |
574 |
59 |
14 |
65 |
3 |
.255 |
|
LAD |
$15.02 |
$20.45 |
649 |
81 |
13 |
56 |
25 |
.239 |
The three-star tier is crowed. It is mostly a combination of speed-only guys who don’t quite offer enough of anything else to make it to the four-star group along with all-around performers who don’t quite produce enough to make it to the four-star group either. In a standard mixed league, nearly all of these guys are likely to be starting for someone.
Segura and Bogaerts offer the most upside. Bogaerts struggled last year in his first full season, but is still very young and now has an extremely improved lineup around him in his sophomore campaign. Segura looks to bounce back from a lost campaign that included the unfathomable tragedy of losing his infant son. Rollins’s raw numbers are enticing (and PECOTA loves him), but his age makes me reluctant to rank him any higher.
Three-Star Value Pick: Erick Aybar
I could duplicate last year’s comment for Aybar in this space. He gets no respect from either the NFBC drafters or PECOTA, but every year Aybar steadily produces 6-10 home runs, 15-20 steals, and a solid batting average. There are other guys I’d rather have in a vacuum, but if you don’t want to overreach for position scarcity, taking Aybar in the 13th or 14th round of a 15-teamer is a solid play.
Two Star
Player |
Team |
Mixed $ |
AL/NL $ |
PA |
R |
HR |
RBI |
SB |
AVG |
Daniel Santana |
MIN |
$13.87 |
$19.27 |
639 |
74 |
7 |
52 |
24 |
.274 |
CHC |
$8.68 |
$18.73 |
520 |
66 |
25 |
71 |
14 |
.224 |
|
ARI |
$0.83 |
$14.85 |
536 |
56 |
11 |
54 |
12 |
.262 |
|
$2.34 |
$12.82 |
566 |
62 |
13 |
58 |
10 |
.250 |
||
BAL |
-$0.88 |
$10.77 |
568 |
55 |
15 |
65 |
1 |
.249 |
The two-star tier is an odd mixture of reliable performers with a low ceiling due to low batting averages and a couple of players who are getting a lot of ADP love despite a limited track record or no track record. Asdrubal and Hardy are the boring reliable guys who probably won’t do more than earn $15 or in the only leagues at best, and are the definition of replacement level in standard mixed. Hardy’s power swoon last year was likely an anomaly, so he could be a sneaky power source.
Santana and Baez are the early positional ADP darlings but both come with a high amount of risk. At least the Baez love is understandable. Despite the considerable downside, if he can overcome the greater than 40 percent whiff rate and post that PECOTA projection, he’d be worth owning in standard mixed even with that bad BA. Santana was great last year but his value was tied to a .405 BABIP that elevated his numbers across the board. Maybe Santana can be an Escobar or Andrus type, but that is his ceiling and the floor is extremely ugly.
Two-Star Value Pick: Chris Owings
The shoulder is a concern to some degree, but with Didi Gregorius out of the picture, Owings should get a clean shot at the shortstop job in Arizona. As the tiers above demonstrate, power/speed combinations at shortstop aren’t particularly common, and Owings has 15-home-run/15-stolen-base potential. The batting average might not be there, but it isn’t there for any of the other players in this group anyway (unless you believe Santana is going to duplicate that BABIP).
One Star
Player |
Team |
Mixed $ |
AL/NL $ |
PA |
R |
HR |
RBI |
SB |
AVG |
SEA |
-$15,06 |
$5.94 |
382 |
41 |
9 |
40 |
5 |
.250 |
|
HOU |
-$2.23 |
$9.89 |
534 |
56 |
12 |
57 |
1 |
.258 |
|
Didi Gregorius |
NYY |
-$14.76 |
$5.36 |
445 |
43 |
8 |
44 |
2 |
.244 |
ATL |
$5.42 |
$15.14 |
634 |
70 |
12 |
58 |
6 |
.255 |
|
-$9.42 |
$8.67 |
531 |
51 |
8 |
49 |
3 |
.238 |
||
NYM |
-$4.12 |
$11.55 |
512 |
51 |
14 |
58 |
1 |
.254 |
Welcome to the one-star tier. Residing here are either the boring, vanilla deeper mixed and only options or the guys whose upside isn’t enough to overreach in a standard mixed. Crawford and Lowrie are both capable major leaguers, but Crawford’s ceiling seems awfully limited while Lowrie always seems to be somewhat dinged up. PECOTA is a big believer in a Simmons’ bounce back, but the power from 2013 is going to seem like an anomaly unless or until he does it again. Miller was probably overrated last year but perhaps could do a little bit better with another season under his belt. Gregorius gets the park boost but it is an open question as to where his offensive ceiling is.
One-Star Value Pick: Wilmer Flores
He isn’t discussed much as a young up-and-comer, but Flores held his own in half a season in Triple-A at the age of 22 (in a very favorable offensive environment, granted) before his promotion to the Mets. Flores is being ignored by many who believe that he won’t hold his own defensively at shortstop, but if the glove survives that PECOTA projection isn’t out of the question. It is a shame that the Mets piss poor financial situation has turned Flores’s name into a part of a punchline, but don’t let that fool you into overemphasizing the major league results for a 22-year-old in two abbreviated stints at Citi Field. There is still a lot of opportunity for growth.
Thank you for reading
This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.
Subscribe now
Reyes projection: .286 / 84 / 11 / 60 / 29
Escobar last year: .285 / 74 / 3 / 50 / 31
Escobar projection: .259 / 73 / 4 / 46 / 30
Alexei last year: .273 / 82 / 15 / 74 / 21
Alexei projection: .266 / 62 / 9 / 59 / 21
Hanley last year: .283 / 64 / 13 / 71 / 14 (512 PA)
Hanley projection: .265 / 74 / 18 / 71 / 18 (580 PA)
Seems like PECOTA thinks only Reyes can keep his BA from last year, but almost everything else will stay the same (except that Alexei is going to have less power and a harder time scoring). How much of that $ value for Reyes comes from his projected BA? If you dropped it to Alexei's projected level, he'd still be 20 runs and 8 steals better, but that only gets him to like $14-15, right?
Which brings up a different question - if, instead of Reyes failing to hit .286, you instead assumed that a bunch of these other guys would also hit the same as last year (except Tulo) - that would bring up the BA available at SS, but would it significantly reduce the value of Reyes, or only slightly reduce it?
It would only slightly reduce Reyes's value. Contextual changes have to be extremely significant to move the valuation needle.