First-day wrap-up, bullet-point style:
-
Cole Hamels, America. America, Cole Hamels. Look, maybe it came a year too late for Phillies fans, who would have liked to see this version of Hamels take on the Rockies in last year’s Division Series, but when a lefty starter puts down the Brewers the way Hamels did, you have to take notice. His outing was dominant, not in a Nolan Ryan way, but in a way that leaves you watching a 3-0 game with absolutely no sense that it might get to 3-3.
What struck me, watching Hamels’ post-game presser, was how much he reminded me of Mike Mussina. As a pitcher, you get Johan Santana—fastball/changeup, fly balls, command—but listening to his answers, there was definitely a “smarter than the room” feeling. I don’t mean that critically—I like pitchers to have a mind at work, and arrogance isn’t a trait that bothers me at all. I came away from the combination of his pitching and his talking about his pitching with a sense that Hamels is going to take another step forward at some point and become a Cy Young winner. Or maybe he’ll just end up in a park that doesn’t punish fly balls. In any case, I was impressed.
-
When they weren’t being owned by Hamels, the Brewers were gift-wrapping runs for the Phillies. The three-run third was entirely about their bad defense. Bill Hall fumbled a bunt that could have become a fielder’s choice or double play. Rickie Weeks flat-out dropped Hall’s throw to first on the same play. Mike Cameron misjudged a fly ball by Chase Utley. In a five-minute span, the Brewers made three key misplays that put two runs on the board on a day when they would score just one.
The third inning was an extreme example, but you can take from it that the Brewers still have a ways to go in building their defense, They’re better now than they were a year ago, but it’s time to try Weeks in center field, to get a major league second baseman, and to make defense the priority that successful teams like the Red Sox, Rays, and Cubs have.
-
Brad Lidge‘s adventurous ninth inning may affect his availability today. He threw 35 pitches, struggling mightily with command of his slider. The Brewers didn’t hit him very hard, but the deep counts they ran up added to concern over Lidge, who threw more than 30 pitches just once all season, and got the day off after. I imagine he’s available, but if he comes in, he’ll be as vulnerable as he’s been all year long, and a long outing could be very dangerous to his effectiveness.
I’m less concerned about Lidge’s specific struggles of late than I am about the type of pitcher he is in general. As a fastball/slider pitcher who worked up in the zone, Lidge was homer-prone, even at his best. The unusual element of his 2008 season isn’t his strikeout rate, ERA, or even his success at converting save opportunities. No, it’s his home-run rate. Lidge allowed just two homers all season, three below his career best of five in 2005. This is on the heels of allowing 19 homers in 2006 and 2007 combined.
This didn’t coincide with some change in his fly-ball rate. Lidge still puts balls in the air. It didn’t coincide with a trade to San Diego, but rather, a move from one good home-run park to another. No, Lidge’s home-run rate, which drives the rest of his good numbers, is a statistical outlier. There’s nothing in him that’s changed to make him less likely to allow longballs; the 70 percent drop in his HR/FB rate is what’s caused it, and that’s just a fluke. Just seven pitchers with at least 30 innings in the NL had a lower HR/FB rate than Lidge’s 4.3 percent (thanks, Hardball Times).
That, and not his pitch count or command, is why Phillies fans should be worried about Lidge. It would be unfortunate for his run to end with a key homer allowed to blow a post-season save, but that possibility lingers because he’s a hard-throwing fly-ball pitcher who usually gives up 5-10 homers a year.
Dodgers/Cubs
-
Homers by Manny Ramirez, James Loney, and Russell Martin stole the show, but the tone for this game was set by the first batter. Rafael Furcal, essentially on the DL since May 8, stepped to the plate against Ryan Dempster and struck out on six pitches. Doesn’t sound like much, but Furcal’s working a 3-2 count was the kind of work the Dodgers have been missing from the top spot in the lineup. Furcal would see 29 pitches in five plate appearances, drawing two walks and scoring a run, giving the Dodgers a huge upgrade in the leadoff spot and at shortstop. The return of Furcal cuts the difference between these two teams to almost nothing.
-
Ryan Dempster, the Cubs’ third-best starter, was pegged to start Game One because of his home-road split this season. That’s a pretty bad reason to pick a starting pitcher when we know that single-season home/road splits are more noise than signal. Dempster struggled desperately with his command, walking seven of the first 21 batters he faced before Loney changed the game with a grand slam in the fifth.
Nate Silver raised a good point: why was Dempster facing Loney in a situation where he clearly was struggling? That he had a two-hit shutout was clearly misleading, and the importance of any given game, inning, and batter is magnified in a best-of-five series. Dempster walked three of the four batters in front of Loney, including the last two, throwing seven of his last eight pitches before Loney for balls. His command had deserted him, and that loss of command cost him when, on a 1-2 pitch to Loney, he grooved a thigh-high fastball. (People watching the game at home learned that thigh-high fastballs are “up in the zone.” Indeed.) Perhaps some aggressiveness by Lou Piniella—some imagination—would have saved the Cubs’ bacon on a night when his handpicked #1 starter was channeling the mediocre Marlin of his younger days.
-
Derek Lowe had his command, walking one and striking out six in six innings. He benefited from a Cubs’ lineup featuring seven right-handed batters (counting Dempster), just as Chad Billingsley will tonight. The Cubs do hit righties well, but having to face tough northpaws who hold right-handed batters in check—Billingsley held them to a 621 OPS this year—makes their job that much more difficult. Some Mike Fontenot might be in order this evening.
By the way, if anyone has any idea what version of Carlos Zambrano we’ll see tonight, drop me a line. This is a guy who since September 3 has skipped a start, thrown a no-hitter, then been crushed in his next two outings. I’m not sure there’s any good way of predicting what pitcher will show up in what is the most important game the Cubs have played in a long time.
Red Sox/Angels
-
This series changed in the sixth inning of Game One, when Jason Bay turned around a John Lackey fastball like he knew it was coming, giving the Red Sox a 2-1 lead they would eventually stretch to a 4-1 final. Beating Lackey puts the Red Sox in the catbird seat, not because of home-field advantage, but because last night’s matchup was the one in the series where they were taking the worst of it. Now, they’ll have the better starter in each of the next two games, and yes, be home for two of the next three.
It was good to see Bay be part of the story, because it allows me to reiterate the point I’ve been making since the afternoon of July 31: the Red Sox got a little better by trading Manny Ramirez for Jason Bay. Bay matched Ramirez’s production for the Sox, and he’s a much better defensive outfielder than Ramirez is. Forget all the off-field concerns, even forget that Bay comes in at half the price of Ramirez; just know that Jason Bay is just as good a player, all things considered, as Ramirez is at this stage of their careers.
-
In my preview of this series, I noted that Mike Scioscia might keep playing Angels baseball with something shy of Angels players. This team has much less speed, top to bottom, than it did earlier in the decade, so the aggressive baserunning comes with more cost. Scioscia’s inability or unwillingness to see the limitations of his personnel is perhaps the one thing about his management style that hurts the team.
-
Think about the eighth inning last night, with Vladimir Guerrero on first base with one out. There was a time when Guerrero was a five-tool player capable of running the bases well and quickly. Knee and back problems have ended that time, leaving Guerrero a dangerous right-handed bat with a strong arm in right field, but little to no speed or range. Scioscia acknowledged this, in part, by using Guerrero at DH and Gary Matthews Jr. in right field (a problem in and of itself). In the eighth inning last night, though, he needed to go further by pinch-running for Guerrero. I don’t know who is faster, Reggie Willits or Sean Rodriguez, but one of them needed to be on first base when Torii Hunter‘s bloop landed in right field.
The focus, after the play, was on Kevin Youkilis‘ excellent recovery and Guerrero’s decision to even attempt to go to third base. Youkilis did make a nice play, although his throw (labeled a good one on air) was terrible, arcing and 20 feet from the third-base bag. It got the job done, however, because Guerrero and his piano were even further away from third base when it arrived. Guerrero took criticism on the broadcast for making the decision to go, but the fact is, it was the right one—he was running on a guy face down in short right field facing away from the play, and with one out, you go for third base—but he shouldn’t have been the one making it. It should have been Willits.
I really do love these two days, with the three-game marathons. It’s not quite the first two days of the NCAA tournament, but it has a similar feel. Today’s games, with the Cubs and Brewers in must-win or close to it situations, and the first post-season game in Rays history, should be a lot of fun.
Thank you for reading
This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.
Subscribe now
The difference isn\'t as stark as it was in 2007 (tRA+ of 151 vs. 89), but it\'s still there.
I do have to disagree with Mr. Sheehan about the Guerrero to third play. Youkilis\' throw wasn\'t \"20 feet from the bag\" at all. It might have been 10 feet, but probably not even, and in any case he got Guerrero by more than the distance between where Lowell caught his throw and third base.
More importantly, it was a bad play by Vlad to try to run there. Had Wilits been on first, then it might have been a good gamble to try to reach third, but with Guererro, I don\'t think you can make that argument. Youkilis didn\'t miss catching Hunter\'s pop up by much, and I\'m pretty sure theres no way that Vlad could have known whether or not the ball was going to be caught. Vlad should have been half way between first and second, not at second when the ball fell in. If Youkilis makes that catch its a double play. The way I saw it, it was a bad play on Vlad on multiple levels.
Where I don\'t think there\'s room for disagreement is that it shouldn\'t have been Vlad carrying the water. You have to pinch-run for the tying run in that situation. Throw in a rookie righthander who\'s not quick to the plate, and Willits absolutely should have pinch-run and tried to steal. At the least, he makes third.
However, Guerrero ran through a stop sign from his coach, who had a much better vantage point. Watch the play again in slow-mo (I did, several times). At the point at which Guerrero was on second base, Youkilis is already up and throwing; the third-base coach raises the \"stop\" signal a half-second later, with Guerrero clearly looking in his direction. Buck Martinez\' claim that he had \"committed\" to running to third notwithstanding, he could easily have stopped and returned to second base at that point. It was a boneheaded decision to ignore the signal.
We\'ve seen the real speedsters come home from second on a sacrifice fly or wild pitch, but that doesn\'t make it a good play for everyone to try to come home from second on a sac fly. A player needs to know their limitations and run station to station if that is all they can do. After the bloop, Scioscia could have been reminded of Vlad\'s limitations and pinch run with a player who would have scored from second on any type of single, but Vlad took that possibility out of his coach\'s hands.
You don\'t want to get too down on a guy trying to make a hustle play for a team that emphasizes hustle plays, but it was a critical mistake.
But what I can\'t forget is that Manny\'s season line of .332/.430/.601 dwarfs Bay\'s line of .286/.373/.522. Joe is engaging in cherry picking by comparing Bay\'s Red Sox stats to Manny\'s Red Sox stats and ignoring the rest of the season when the players performed vastly differently from each other. Let\'s also not forget that the Red Sox are still paying Manny\'s salary when evaluating the value of Bay\'s lower salary. Lastly, Joe\'s closing caveat, at this stage of their careers\" seems to indicate that Manny is in decline. A quick check of his OPS per season indicates that this is not so. Except for last year, Manny\'s OPS has been right around 1.000 since he came to the Red Sox in 2001 and this year is no different as he finished at 1.031. Bay however may be in decline as his OPS has fallen from .961 in his first full season in 2005 to .928 in 2006 to .746 in 2007 to .895 in 2008.
The two players\' raw lines post-trade are considerably different, although I have to say that level of competition issues make me think the gap isn\'t quite so wide. I\'ll bet Will\'s house that Bay faced a much tougher slate of pitchers and defenses in those two months. The league gap is just that big.
Bay\'s decline is actually a four-year peak with a knee injury in the middle, one he never should have played through. Given where offense went this year and the variability of these stats, there\'s not much difference between a 928 OPS in 2006 and an 895 one in 2008. It\'s about seven points of EqA or so.
For those fans of Bill Simmons, he revisits the Manny deal in an article posted on ESPN today. He may have a \'Boston media\' angle more to your liking.
But you do point to a less-than-clear phrasing.
In fact as a Phillies fan, although I don\'t have the numbers to back it up, it seems like HRs allowed were down throughout the staff this year.
Vlad made a bad move, but i\'m also just as frustrated when the Angels failed to run. GA should have made it to third not stop at second, on a hit early in the game. Then as the announcers said, Hunter should have tried to steal 2nd in the 8th. Worst case would have been HK leading off the next inning if Hunter had been thrown out.
Vlad got two hits, but perhaps even worse than that was his swinging at the first pitch in the first inning with two on .... and popping up to right.
This is far from a done deal though. It\'s a new day.
Now maybe it was a bad call to go with Dempster over Zambrano or Harden, but you have to think it was based on who was pitching better in September rather than his home/road splits.
It is a travesty.
In the top of the 9th, with one out and the score 2-1, Ellsbury was at the plate and Lowrie on 2b. Anderson played in shallow left, Hunter played in shallow center. Matthews, however, was way deep in right, at \"no doubles\" depth -- seemingly far too deep for that situation (even though Ellsbury had hit a ball to deep right center in the 1st). When Ellsbury ground one through right side of the infield, Matthews was way too deep to have a shot at Lowrie.