For much of last night, it was 1996 again. Or 1998. Or maybe 2000. You had Andy Pettitte getting big outs, a deep lineup grinding away at an opposing starting pitcher, a key break going the Yankees‘ way, a crowd buzzing with confidence, eager to celebrate a clinching. Forget that it was a new building, or that the guy who got the biggest hit not so long ago contributed to a dark day in franchise history, or that the big plays were consecutive bunts, or that Mariano Rivera managed to give up a run. For one night, Aura and Mystique did a show in the Bronx, and when they were done, the World Series was coming home again.
For all the pregame discussion about possibly using CC Sabathia, Joe Girardi made the right decision in starting Andy Pettitte. The dropoff between the two over one game is small, and the Yankees’ ability to start Sabathia against Cliff Lee Wednesday, and perhaps to use him three times in the World Series, is a key to their ability to beat the Phillies. Girardi didn’t necessarily make the win-maximizing decision for one night, but he unquestionably made the championship-maximizing decision.
It didn’t hurt that Pettitte pulled out a start from his dynasty days, pounding the strike zone and spending the whole night ahead of the Angels hitters. Of the 25 men Pettitte faced, 19 started out 0-1, and eight started 0-2. All told, Pettitte threw strikes on nearly two-thirds of his 99 pitches, scattering seven hits and walking one man. When he left in the seventh holding a 3-1 lead, you half expected to see Jeff Nelson come in and Bob Sheppard make the announcement.
Contrast Pettitte’s work with that of Joe Saunders, a similar pitcher by type who on this night threw 83 pitches, 42 of them out of the strike zone. Saunders walked five and got strike three on exactly no one, the latter turning into a real problem for him during the game. Strikeout rate isn’t just a predictor of longevity, it’s a proxy for how much a pitcher can help himself. Saunders, who doesn’t strike out many men, repeatedly started off 1-0 (15 of 22 batters), then would work the count to two strikes without being able to close things out. Saunders got just one swing-and-miss all night, and gave up two hits on 1-2 counts and two critical walks after getting two strikes on Robinson Cano and Derek Jeter in the fourth. The inability to put hitters away killed Saunders last night.
At that, Saunders allowed just three runs, a figure the Angels would have blown by in many games this season. In this postseason, however, the Angels have been killed by the inability of their table-setters to, well, set the table. Chone Figgins and Bobby Abreu each did have a single last night, and each were involved in the Angels’ two runs (Abreu driving in the first, Figgins scoring the second). But the Angels needed more from them, needed them on base more than once apiece. The two combined for a sub-.300 OBP, which is perhaps the biggest reason that the Angels lost this series.
The Angels’ difficulty scoring runs made Mike Scioscia‘s curious decision to bench his most effective lefty-crusher that much more damaging. Mike Napoli has suffered the indignity of being benched when John Lackey pitches, of being repeatedly pinch-hit for by Gary Matthews Jr., and last night was sat down so that Jeff Mathis-who’s been a better hitter than Napoli since at least Tuesday-could play. I might buy the idea that Scioscia was riding a hot hand of sorts, but if that were the case, shouldn’t Figgins, Abreu, or Kendry Morales have been sitting? If you absolutely have to play Mathis, fine; it’s wrong, but go ahead. But you have to find a way to get Napoli, your best hitter against lefties over the past two seasons, into the lineup. Morales, Abreu… hell, sit Vladimir Guerrero. But to not play Napoli in an elimination game against a left-handed starter is a terrible decision, baseball malpractice of the highest order. In an amusing end, Scioscia sent up Matthews to hit for Napoli one last time, with two outs in the ninth. Batting a bad left-handed hitter for a good right-handed one against Mariano Rivera shows a rather disturbing lack of situational awareness.
Scioscia didn’t have a very good game, being slow to lift Saunders in the third-Jered Weaver should have been throwing as early as the second inning-then unnecessarily exposing Ervin Santana to a stretch of left-handed batters in the eighth. Down one run with maybe one inning left, Santana needed to be Brian Fuentes, or perhaps Scott Kazmir. Santana’s struggles against lefties are a career-long thing, and you have to be tactical when one run matters. That Scioscia eventually got Weaver into the game, for one out when down three runs, might have been interesting if I hadn’t been distracted by all the horses running around the outfield. Weaver, probably the second best pitcher the Angels have, got four outs in the last six days of this series. He should have been called upon earlier, and for more, last night.
By the time Weaver came in, the game was essentially over thanks to an eighth-inning meltdown by the Angels defense. On consecutive sacrifice bunts-Joe Girardi gives away outs like they’re Halloween candy-Howie Kendrick dropped a throw and Scott Kazmir threw a ball over his head, turning a 3-2 game into 4-2 and eventually 5-2. The errors, added to Vladimir Guerrero’s brutal baserunning earlier, capped a series in which the Angels belied their reputation for heady play with repeated mental and physical mistakes. Just as the Twins had in the Division Series, the Angels showed that a reputation for playing fundamental baseball doesn’t necessarily mean you always play fundamental baseball. It wasn’t as costly as the no-shows atop the lineup or the weak bullpen, but their poor decision-making and execution were part of why they lost.
CC Sabathia was awarded the MVP of the ALCS, and while Sabathia was terrific in his two starts, I have to assume this means that Alex Rodriguez didn’t make it through the primary or something. Because if he was eligible for the award and didn’t get it, after being the best hitter in the series and having a dramatic extra-inning home run in a key game, that would mean that the voters, of all things, couldn’t come up big in October. And that’s a bit too much irony for Monday.
—
-
It’s not like Joe Girardi didn’t try to give us a Game Seven. He had his charges lay down three sacrifice bunts, including a particularly dumb one against a struggling Saunders in the fourth inning, and a 2-0 bunt that led to the Kendrick error in the eighth. He also seems to have elevated Joba Chamberlain ahead of Phil Hughes in the bullpen pecking order, which is a bit like deciding Jeff Mathis is better than Mike Napoli if that decision weren’t quite so ridiculous. The Yankees are 7-2 in this postseason in spite of their manager, and given the gap between Girardi and Charlie Manuel, that record may have no place to go but down.
-
In the interest of fairness, I should note that Girardi’s aggressive use of Mariano Rivera in this postseason is completely to his credit. He’s leveraged the additional days off on the schedule to maximize the use of his top relief pitcher. He should do so less at Hughes’ expense than at the expense of others, but it’s a start.
-
Kendry Morales’ 3-6-3 double play in the seventh inning will be forgotten because it came in a loss, but it was the defensive play of the series. I don’t think Morales has much lateral range, but he showed both good hands and a strong arm in this series. He’s at least an average defensive first baseman, and may still get better.
-
In the Yankee clubhouse after the game, maybe 20 minutes after the first pitch, Kenny Albert asked a champagne-soaked Rivera, “Have you started thinking about the Phillies yet?” I would have given anything for this:
“Yeah, Kenny, that’s what I was just doing, and all these mother******s won’t shut up. My scouting reports are soaked in this crappy grape juice they’re calling champagne. I need to think about whether to throw the cutter to Ryan Howard or maybe go to the knuckleball I’ve been working on. The 15 or 20 minutes we’ve had since the game ended…it’s all wasted time. We’ll never get it back. If we lose the World Series, lose because of a lack of preparation, these guys will have to live with that. Now get out of my face so I can go back to thinking about the Phillies.”
-
New York and Philadelphia. I’m starting to believe in the Curse of Jeffrey Loria. Since Game Five of the 2003 World Series-eventually won by Loria’s Marlins-there hasn’t been an outdoor World Series game played in a place warmer than St. Louis.
I’ll be back Wednesday with some thoughts on the World Series.
Thank you for reading
This is a free article. If you enjoyed it, consider subscribing to Baseball Prospectus. Subscriptions support ongoing public baseball research and analysis in an increasingly proprietary environment.
Subscribe now
You probably mean last pitch.
Well, pounding the BALL zone and having them CALLED strikes, but hey, that's what professionals do: take advantage of opportunities.
Contrast Pettitte's work with that of Joe Saunders, a similar pitcher by type who on this night threw 83 pitches, 42 of them out of the strike zone. Saunders walked five and got strike three on exactly no one, the latter turning into a real problem for him during the game. "
Exactly. Go back to the Pitch/FX on this one; the difference wasn't in what they were throwing, but in what those throws were getting called -- especially in the first three innings. I'd love to see the alternate history in which those pitches were called based on where they were, rather than on where the ump thought they were. For at least this one game, the bad calls were NOT evening out -- Pettitte was getting the Tom Glavine Memorial Strike Zone, and Saunders was getting squeezed like a python's next meal.
That's not to say that the Yanks might not have won anyway; it's just noting that the playing field for this game was badly tilted, and that blaming Saunders for his "inability to throw strikes" is misplacing the blame.
"You can buy a pennant."
Off the board. Not because its incorrect, simply because doing so deprives the author of more instructive levels of correction for his asinine statement.
Of course you can buy a pennant. Everybody buys their pennant, unless I missed the last time an all volunteer team won the world series. The Phillies bought their pennant. Last year the Ray's bought theirs on the discount rack. Back in the 20's the Yankees bought theirs in the "Nobody else is allowed to pay Ruth but us aisle"
Y'know what, I hate the fricking Yankees too. I think its the patriotic duty of any red blooded american outside of the NYC or Tampa area to hate the Yankees.
But the Yankees did not do anything Evil to win this pennant.
When I have time to take a coffee break in the morning while drinking coffee at work, that's when I really want to read some baseball.
This is turning into an issue that will likely cause me not to resubscribe.
The difference in calls between the two pitchers totals six pitches, and, obviously, SIX batters. That's pretty significant, especially if were only counting the early innings. That's an average almost one batter per inning - three pitches the Yankees didn't have to swing at, getting them into better counts, forcing Saunders to come in with an even better, more "hittable" pitch.
Conversely, the Halos were forced into worse counts on three different batters, causing them to "have" to swing at "less hittable" pitches because they had a less favorable count.
That's a pretty big deal, and would absolutely affect the outcome of an at bat, an inning, and, yes, ultimately, the game.
The results do support the idea that Pettitte got a little help with 4 pitches outside the strike zone. Interestingly enough, the location of those pitches was very near the location where Saunders got his "extra" strike called.
Perhaps if Saunders had thrown more pitches in that location, he would have gained an advantage there as well?
8 NYA called strikes outside the zone, all on the side away from a RHB.
3 LAA called strikes outside the zone, 2 of them very close. (And one called ball, in exactly the same spot as 2 called NYA strikes.)
4 NYA called balls inside the zone (2 up, 2 down)
5 LAA called balls inside the zone, 1 of them not even close to the edge.
5-to-2 errors against counts as getting squeezed for me, though again this is not just Saunders. 8 gift strikes outside the outside corner is Glavinesque. And the five worst calls, in terms of distance of error, all went against Anaheim.
Should Saunders have thrown more pitches in the area where Pettitte was getting his bogus calls? If that's not his game, why should the umpire take away his strengths?
I agree that LAA got ripped off on one pitch. However, that wasn't Saunders, which is what the original discussion was about. (I think that was a Kazmir pitch.)
If you want to argue that the Angels got squeezed, then I might listen. However, arguing that Saunders got squeezed just doesn't agree with the data. He was simply all over the place with his pitches.
If you want to argue that Pettitte was favored with a generous strike zone, I might go along with that. He also helped himself by not being as erratic as Saunders.
"I will start thinking about them on Tuesday."
No, Aura and Mystique did not show up in the Bronx. It was a poorly played game with predictably homer pitch calling and no 9th inning suspense.
Joe, we know you're a Yankee fan who wears it on his sleeve. But, please, try to pull together enough objectivity to avoid calling the Bronx the home of the World Series. That's just nauseating.
Though I could be wrong. I *did* turn off my paranoid self-delusional moron switch this morning.
Chances are both managers will make typical decisions, a few bad ones and a few good ones. The bad ones might lose a game, the good ones win one. But is Manuel somehow immune to this? Is he going to use Lidge with the game on the line? Because then he automatically fails.
I'm tired of comparing managers. It means next to nothing.
o The Yankees have the highest paid player in all of baseball at 6 out of 11 positions (SP, RP, 1b, 3b, C, SS, but not DH (second place), 2b, or the 3 OF spots). More than 50% their positions are filled with the highest paid player.
o The Yankees got 48 of their 59 innings (thanks Fangraphs) from guys making $15,285,714, $16,500,000, $15,000,000 and $5,500,000. All 3 starters were 2009 free agent signs. (Numbers from ttp://mlbcontracts.blogspot.com/)
o Four of the Top 5 Contracts of all time play for the Yankees (Arod (twice), Jeter, CC, Texeira).
That's bought in a way different from the Phillies, Angels, Dodgers, etc. Those teams compete with one another, but the Yankees compete with no one. Other fans can only hope for more Carl Pavanos, Jason Giambi, Javier Vazquez mistakes or injuries.
Just because they don't doesn't mean they can't, and the Yankees shouldn't be the ones people cry foul at for this.
The reason the Yankees and the Red Sox have dominated the high salary portion of this game is because so many other teams have decided not to compete with them. Or if they have, like the Mets, they've done it poorly.
"Yeah, Kenny, that's what I was just doing, and all these mother******s won't shut up. My scouting reports are soaked in this crappy grape juice they're calling champagne. I need to think about whether to throw the cutter to Ryan Howard or maybe go to the knuckleball I've been working on. The 15 or 20 minutes we've had since the game ended…it's all wasted time. We'll never get it back. If we lose the World Series, lose because of a lack of preparation, these guys will have to live with that. Now get out of my face so I can go back to thinking about the Phillies."
PLEASE! tell me you saw Jeters' comments to him on the field, i think the question was about how they haven't won since 2000 and haven't made the series since 2003. Jeter replied uncharacteristically and said something to the effect of "you had to go straight to the negative didn't you? thanks for that." it was one of the harsher comments i've ever seen Jeter make and it was totally justified.
Hey, the Yankees play by the same baseball rules as any other team. They (and other high revenue teams) pay millions of dollars to so called small market teams through revenue sharing and luxury tax. If those teams don't use that money to pay for their own top talent or sign helpful middle level free agents or the like, that's not the Yankees' fault.
The yankees pay a 40%